Is misandry rife within the feminist community?

Answer 1

No, in fact, I would say that misandrists are not feminists at all, but use that "label" because they think they know what feminism is all about, when they really have no clue. Personally, I think misandrists, like racists and misogynists, are mentally ill, to some degree.

And "Egghead," please cite the "feminists" these quotes are attributed to. That would help a lot in determining whether these "feminists" were central to the movement, or just hated men and CALLED themselves feminists. I would wager that MOST of these quotes are by two or three of the same women, and they are NOT in the mainstream movement...I await your generous consideration, and thank you in advance.

Answer 2

Witness the attitude of the above post, by a feminist, to a legitimate question asked by a man. If the same question had been posted by a woman, you can best bet the response would have been different. Need anyone say more.

Edit - wendy g - Has it ever occurred to you that you might be the one that's just "calling herself" a feminist? Wake up and smell the coffee. Take a look at what you're supporting and consider starting a movement about what you REALLY want, under another name. Feminism must die.

Answer 3

As women have attained "equality" long ago, and now in many ways, have a clearly privileged position throughout our society and economy, if the feminists (and their pet renegade-males) didn't engage in systematic denigration, public contempt for and hatred of men (misandry), they would have absolutely nothing to hold them together. Misandry ( along with the corresponding contempt for the majority of normal women who love men) is the core of their agenda, if not the sum of their agenda itself.

It is long past time for real men, and the women who love them, to disregard the ravings of these malcontents, protect themselves and their children, (especially their daughters) from them, start to work to repeal most of the legislation which they have saddled us with since the early 1970's, to the grievous detriment of the traditional family, exclude women from the provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights act, and begin to renormalize our society! This will free up the courts to deal with actual problems.

Women's Studies programs, which are all feminist, man-hating propaganda, can be defunded and disbanded as well. So can funding for "womens sports". (Heterosexual) men's bars and clubs, where women once again play a decorative, ancillary, or (dare I say it, even submissive) role can once again be encouraged and popularized.

There are probably too many women pursuing "higher education, as a result denying many men an important means of support of their families, of securing their upward socioeconomic mobility, and fostering gender confusion in otherwise normal females.

There is indeed an inverse correlation around the world between fertility and female education over the past six generations or so. These facts should be publicized as widely as possible, and linked as much as possible to feminism, and its pathogenic cult of misandry and gender "equality".

Misandry is the symptom; feminism is the disease, complementarity--NOT EQUALITY-- is the cure!

This won't eliminate their misandry by itself, as nothing can do that, but it will protect the rest of us from the resultant malice and inbecility. Because, for a change, the laws of nature and biology will be on our side, the process of healing should be much more rapid than the destruction that those harpies (and their renegade-males) have wrought in our laws, our schools, our churches, and our media and culture!!

Answer 4

Not within the feminist community at large, but the 'radical feminists', especially those in educational institutions, oh, Hell yes. It's unfortunate that this is accepted, considering that this misandric system of belief is passed on to the young students taking the various women's studies programs.

Answer 5

LOL Annie. You've heard of a dictionary? Use one.

To answer the question, heck yeah, misandry is rfe within the feminist community. It's what gets all their panties wet.

Answer 6

possibly i'm incorrect yet I easily have never considered JB as any style of feminist mouthpiece? I however she replaced into basically a journalist who loved to result to ask your self approaches any way she could desire to. besides, that's been some years when you consider that I study Germaine Greer on transsexuals yet as I bear in mind, her communicate replaced right into somewhat extra complicated than Julie's rant. She spoke of how that male id is amazingly strongly defined and "policed" by utilising adult adult males, with the result that everybody who does not fall well into that's categorized as "no longer male/ lady", meaning that femininity finally ends up meaning a scarcity or mutation of masculinity ... she potential that m2f transgender people do no longer in good shape with a reliable definition of masculinity and as a result she says that they are placed decrease than social tension to define themselves needless to say by utilising "turning out to be a girl". the regular grievance (however I admit she's often ambiguous and that i'm specific she does use inflammatory language) is that if the way society perspectives gender, no longer of transsexuals themselves. I easily have not study different feminists in this concern and that i haven't study each and everything Germaine Greer has written, so please be at liberty to tutor me incorrect. even with the undeniable fact that, i think of lots relies upon on whether you define "transphobia" as an unwillingness to have faith that transsexuals are quite women folk, or a desire to think of approximately in words different than "lady trapped in guy's physique". i do no longer hate transsexuals, i admire those I easily have met. they do no longer disgust me and that i'm by utilising no potential terrified of them, it relatively is what i could go jointly with using "phobia". i wouldn't in any respect undertaking their acceptable to do what they want with their bodies. yet on an analogous time, I dont have faith that they are women folk interior an analogous way that i'm a girl, the two.

Answer 7

Oh, yes. Definitely. Just look at what the leaders of the female supremacist hate-movement known as feminism have said:

• "All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft"

• "The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations...obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign."

• "He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE." (Emphasis in the original.)

• "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males."

• "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race."

• "But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do."

• "Men love death. In everything they make, they hollow out a central place for death, let its rancid smell contaminate every dimension of whatever still survives. Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it, and in life they commit it.

• "Men are animals; don't you think so?"

• "To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo."

• "I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig."

• "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."

• "Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice.

• "The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men."

• "Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience."

• "All men are rapists and that's all they are"

• "All men are good for is f***ing, and running over with a truck".

• "Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do."

• "We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men.

• "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."

• "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat."

• "For one of the implicit, if unadmitted, tenets of feminism has been a fundamental disrespect for men.


Every single statement above was uttered by a woman who called herself a feminist... in fact they're well respected and usually studied in "Women's Studies" classes. Every single statement above is rife with misandry. I have never heard of a feminist distancing herself from any of these statements. Therefore, I have no choice but to conclude that feminism is a hate movement. Nothing but a hate movement run by a bunch of female supremacists.

Answer 8

Everyday woman on the street no at least not intentionaly(there are exceptions)

In academia hell ya

Answer 9

By making this statement you are showing that you are quite ignorant of what feminism really is. Why don't you look it up in a dictionary or better yet find a book (this is something that you read, unless of course your are illiterate, which I would wager is partially correct). Feminism is based on equality for all. It advocates against racism, ageism, sexism, ableism etc. Feminism would probably even advocate for a buffoon such as yourself. Hope this answered your foolish question. Goddess bless.

Answer 10

Although I agree, I think it's mostly the ones who had abusive men in their lives and/or had been sexually assaulted.