English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Clinton's lie was a bj and who did that hurt?
Bush's lie cost the lives of over 2 thousands servicemen and women and that hurts a lot of people!

2006-12-17 02:52:29 · answer #1 · answered by Celeste P 7 · 2 5

IF WMDs where in fact the reason, then WHY wasn't the UN more inclined to get involved? If the IAEAs finding where complete and accurate, they WHY didn't the UN want to get involved? Why was our deranged country chomping at the bit and banging the war drum with incomplete evidence? Why did Bush rush into war with another country under the pretense of "WMDs", when the rest of the world was not so sure that he did in fact have them because the evidence was not conclusive YET?!

Now, in all fairness, Clinton DID lie under oath, and perjury is impeachable. Clinton did commit a crime on the books and it is public record. However, no one can PROVE with evidence that Bush drummed up false intelligence to go to war; even if a large chunk of people feel that it is true.

2006-12-17 05:31:00 · answer #2 · answered by jayne_galaxy 3 · 0 0

Bush didn't lie about anything. He was acting on the input from several reputable sources, including Democrats such as Bob Graham, Carl Levin, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, John Kerry, Jay Rockerfeller, Henry Waxman, Hillary Clinton, etc., who all swore up & down that Saddam Hussein had an active WMD program in the works, as well as Hussein's own bizzare and incriminating games he played with the inspectors.

If he had done nothing, you'd be roasting him over the coals for his Clinton-like lack of response to a clear and immediate danger.

2006-12-17 03:01:23 · answer #3 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 1 1

Uh, Bush didn't lie. EVERYONE, including John Kerry and other Democrats believed it, based upon the intelligence reports, and it was a logical conclusion with no reason to doubt it.

However, the Dems changed their tune only when they sensed it would work to their advantage to do so, just as they changed their attitude about morals for the same reason, regarding the Foley incident and occurrences such as this. Dems are like a cross-breed between snakes and chamelions.

Bill Clinton is an out and right disgrace, however, and should go down and history as such. He betrayed his wife, his daughter and country and is on the same level as Benedict Arnold. The man is basically sickening, and anyone who thinks otherwise needs to see a psychiatrist. Putting his socialist wife into the White House for a second time is true mental illness. And remember also, that he lied to a grand jury, in direct violation and contempt of the law.

2006-12-17 02:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Joe C 5 · 6 1

The Mukhabarat, a Sudanese intelligence company, spent the early to mid-Eighteen Nineties gathering copious quantities of information on bin encumbered and his cohorts at a time whilst they have been fairly unknown and their events limited. They provided this documents to the Clinton administration, persistently, yet Clinton could no longer be stricken. in accordance to Tim Carney, the final united statesAmbassador to Sudan, whose posting led to 1997, "particularly, they have been placing out the doorways, and we weren't taking them up on it. The U.S. did no longer reciprocate Sudan's willingness to work together us on some severe questions of terrorism. we are in a position to speculate that this failure had severe implications a minimum of for what occurred on the U.S. Embassies in 1998. in spite of everything, the U.S. lost get admission to to a mine of cloth on bin encumbered and his agency. It became worse than against the regulation. It became a ****-up." by using fact Clinton became being impeached, his administration would not do something approximately terrorist information from the Sudanese and their own ambassador! 9/11 and the conflict in Iraq would on no account had occurred, if President Clinton were in a position to maintain his zipper fixed and his mouth close. He would have been remembered as an quite large president for combating a terrorist in his tracks. yet he became busy boffing something in cotton panties and could no longer communicate significant stuff like national protection. So, none of it relatively is all good.

2016-10-15 02:58:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush is far worse than Clinton.who did it hurt when clinton lied,just his family.Bush lies is costing us a lot more,Clinton lies Didn't cost lives lost in some senseless war brought on because of LIES.everybody face it,Bush is no good and everyone is going to find out.Hey for the ones that love him so much go fight in his war,he will love you for that?

2006-12-17 06:20:33 · answer #6 · answered by Lady T 5 · 1 0

Slick Willie disgraced the Oval Office! The White House belongs to the people of the USA, you and I, not the resident. He disrespected us!!

President Bush DID NOT LIE! He was working with faulty intelligence from what Slick Willie's stripped down intelligence communities came up with. Who in their right mind thinks that in * months President Bush could have fixed all the broken down government agencies that Slick Willie ruined in the name of "paying down the deficit"? Even an elementary school student can understand that!

2006-12-17 02:59:46 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 1

everything clinton said was a lie and GWB was right about WMDs in iraq since we found 500 chemical weapons that are deadly...

Clinton- " I will not raise taxes" ( he had the biggest tax hike in american histroy)

Clinton- " I can spend your money better than you can." ( he didnt spend any money on anyting for america)


theres some big lies by clinton



LETS GO SAM BROWNBACK

2006-12-17 03:30:21 · answer #8 · answered by libshateme 3 · 0 1

I personally was disgusted by Mr. Starr's hounding of Clinton- BUT- Bill did LIE under oath to a federal judge and grand jury.

No getting around it.

2006-12-17 02:54:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 3 1

I agree with you, it is incredible, but it's not surprising that the Republicans are using these brainwashing tactics and continuously drumming it into the heads of their constituents. They've done it many times before because it's all they've got. But remember what Lincoln said: "You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all of the time".

2006-12-17 02:57:26 · answer #10 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0 2

Hey, I thought your name was Kelly. I was cool with your questions til I noticed the same questions posted under 2 different id's. What are you up to?

2006-12-17 02:57:47 · answer #11 · answered by Kacky 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers