I am under a corporate plan with Atena. The plan says 100% coverage of emergency room services with 100 copay and 80% if admitted to hospital. My wife was admitted in emergency condition in ER. She was diagnosed having an abscess and had t be operated in normal OT for which she was admitted as inpatientas her condition was very critical. Now the Insurance company is saying that the expense of OT and admission is not covered under emergecy room but as inpatient and 20% ha to be borne by us. Is this admission is not incidental to admittance in ER becaue the kind of operation was not possible in ER and that's why she was admitted as inpatient. IS Insurance company correct in denying 100% coverage? How do i deal with them.
2006-12-17
02:04:11
·
4 answers
·
asked by
PA
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics