one commentator was saying that because no one can pick muralis doosra..he shud b checked over and over again...(NZvs SL 2nd test day 3)
2006-12-16 23:13:17 · 12 answers · asked by zafran_zahir 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
hell no!!!! i see it this way.....if murali's action gets mentioned.....and ppl say he should be checked....then murali is doing a good job and bowling well....cause thats when everyone talks about him......if they dont talk about him...then it means that murali isnt bowling well!!!! martin crowe doesnt know shi.t about cricket.....in fact no New zealand cricketers know dog crap about cricket!!!! they havent won a thing!!!! murali is the greatest bowler the game has ever seen and he is the 2nd greatest cricketer ever after don bradman!!!!
2006-12-17 01:25:28 · answer #1 · answered by glen 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
" you ought to also see at the same time as the arm brace became on that he did not get a similar turn that he oftentimes would have as he ought to no longer flex as a lot as he oftentimes would do in tournament circumstances. " Joeblow: placed on an arm brace and attempt to bowl your self and word how complicated it really is with you normaly bowl, See how this large spinner is doing it even this is not conceivable to others. once you've under no circumstances bowl or no journey in bowling in cricktet do not say nonsonse. right here I wont to point a one element it is : large Murali's bolling action happend to be examined biomachanicaly, then it well-knownshows that IF MURALI isn't ALLOWED TO BOWL,THEN ninety 9% BOWLERS IN international CRICKET aren't to any extent further ALLOWED TO BOWL. because of Murali the hidden truth comes out................... because of this ICC replaced the rule of thumb for fairness for each of the bowlers. each of the Bowlers ought to credited to large Murali and ICC Panel for that. Cricket ought to no longer be continuously a Batsmens activity, it really is going to be 50-50 for bowlers. SALUTE for excellent MURALI !................
2016-10-18 09:51:56 · answer #2 · answered by hultman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murali was always a chucker.His records,like Barry Bonds in American Baseball,are tainted.oNE DAY,THEY MAY EVEN TOSS THEM OUT.
2006-12-17 11:12:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I think he has been checked enough.
You can use cameras and other technology if you are a commentator but the umpires have to make the decision in a split second .
Test all bowlers yearly or none.
2006-12-16 23:35:45 · answer #4 · answered by kevin_4508 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is a chucker, but thats OK now because they changed the laws of cricket just for him! it shows that game is run by the subcontinent powers. worse still, expect a whole generation of chuckers in 10 years time, now that its legal to chuck.
2006-12-16 23:27:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a total chucker! He needs to be checked. I cannot trust him farther than I could throw him!
2006-12-17 02:08:38 · answer #6 · answered by lrslapshot96 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is absolutely no need to check him again and by saying that he should be checked it very unfair.
2006-12-17 15:26:11 · answer #7 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course he shud be checked again!
he's the worst chucker in the world!!!!!
i dont trust him an inch!
2006-12-16 23:21:43 · answer #8 · answered by GRam! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope !! i think they should let that great player live in peace...He is been checked enough already.
2006-12-17 04:16:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, THERE IS NO NEED BUT PAKISTAN'S AKHATAR'S ACTION SHOULD BE. WHILE YOU ARE AT THAT GO CHECK DENIS AS WELL.
2006-12-17 02:57:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋