"Gengis Khan (help·info) or Temüjin by birthname, (c. 1162[1]–August 18, 1227) (IPA: [ʧiŋgɪs χaːŋ], Mongolian: Чингис Хаан, Chinese: 成吉思汗 Chéngjísī Hán, Turkic: Chengez Khan, Chinggis Khan, Chinggis Xaan, Chingis Khan, Jenghis Khan, Chinggis Qan, Cengiz Han, Djingis Kahn etc.), was a Mongol political and military leader or Khan (posthumously Khagan[2]) who united the Mongol tribes and founded the Mongol Empire (Yeke Mongol Ulus, Екэ Монгол Улус), (1206–1368), the largest contiguous empire in world history. Born to the name Temüjin in the Borjigin family (Mongolian: Тэмүүжин, Traditional Chinese: 鐵木真; pinyin: Tiěmùzhēn), he forged a powerful army based on meritocracy to become one of the most successful military leaders in history. While his image in most of the world is that of a ruthless, bloodthirsty conqueror, Genghis Khan is an iconic and beloved figure in Mongolia, where he is seen as the father of the Mongol Nation (see also Mongolia). Before becoming a Khan, Temüjin eliminated and united many of the nomadic tribes of north East Asia and Central Asia under a social identity as the "Mongols."
Starting with the invasion of Western Xia and Jin Dynasty in northern China and consolidating through numerous conquests including the Khwarezmid Empire in Persia, Mongol rule across the Eurasian landmass radically altered the demography and geopolitics of these areas. The Mongol Empire ended up ruling, or at least briefly conquering, large parts of modern day China, Mongolia, Russia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Moldova, and Kuwait."
2006-12-16 21:42:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Genghis Khan,nomad chieftain who emerged from the Gobi desert,waged war upon the civilized peoples of the earth and was victorious.
2006-12-16 22:16:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by majoy60 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was the largest empire in the history if mankind stretching from Korea in the east to Poland and furthur in the west.
2006-12-16 21:42:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
contained in the sphere, the Mongols. yet they were crap at operating Empire, the dimensions of an empire isn't the real try, operating one is. The Mongols were merely Barabarians, who even had they no longer again to take area contained in the burial rituals, ought to not in any respect have develop into hoping to carry an Empire for extraordinarily lengthy. also be conscious you're saying Mongols less than Ghengis Khan, it is immediately putting it right into a issue that does no longer upward push up for hundreds of years, and so have the Romans making use of previous-formed technologies. in spite of the undeniable fact that could the technologies be the same, the Roman legions earlier to the 4th Century, may be able to outperform some thing the Mongols ought to manage basically because they were so properly disicplined (they lacked disicipline by technique of the time of Attilla) and may study from their blunders, rather educated, a lot more healthy plus. The Sinews of conflict, infinite funds. also at the same time as it got here to features, the Empire develop into sturdy because in case you've been for the Empire you had its finished danger-free practices also you should develop right into a Roman, so maximum were for the Empire, while the Mongols governed basically by technique of outrage, so they had to ruin to guard their rear, or no longer flow ahead. The hypothesis you recommend continuously favours the Mongols because they were from a later time and had more beneficial technologies, yet contained in the finished the Mongols were no longer some thing, and there isn't any evaluation. that is comparing Spain and England, Spain basically went in for conquest and governed by technique of outrage. Britain on the eve of WW1 had one hundred,000 infantrymen to run the Empire outside India (India had yet another 100k that develop into out numbered 10 to at least a million by technique of the interior sight Sepoys) Germany had 3.5 million infantrymen and develop into unable to triumph over Europe, in a lot the same way Spain develop into unable to carry its Empire. Britain governed by technique of rule of regulation, merely as Rome had carried out, (Britian then voluntarily dismantled its Empire) Spain by technique of outrage, and ought to no longer carry its Empire, a twin of the Mongols when they were no longer modern. Britain nevertheless has an employer contained in the Commonwealth, because there have been a large number of robust factors to our Empire, likewise Rome nevertheless had a large number of others who tried to emulate it, no individual tries to emulate the Mongols.
2016-11-26 23:56:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-12-16 21:39:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by mrtryitall 2
·
0⤊
0⤋