English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

abrupt revision in scores

2006-12-16 19:15:17 · 3 answers · asked by alan h 2 in Sports Cricket

3 answers

First of all.. 1992 World Cup was in Australia and New Zealand, not in Pakistan... and there was no D/L method at that time( It was invented in 1998)..The targets were just revised depending upon the time lost.

South Africa lost their semi-final to England in controversial circumstances when, after a rain delay, the 'highest-scoring overs' rule in use for revising target scores in rain-affected matches revised their target from 22 runs from 13 balls to 21 runs from 1 ball. This rule was replaced for one-day international matches in Australia after the World Cup by a complicated rule in which the score calculated by the highest-scoring overs was reduced by 0.5% for each over lost. This rule was eventually superseded by the Duckworth-Lewis method for the 1999 World Cup.

2006-12-16 19:39:00 · answer #1 · answered by Rick O Connell 3 · 1 0

1992 World Cup matches were played in New Zeland and Australia. The 2nd semi final was played between England and South Africa at Sydney Cricket Ground on 22.03.1992. D/L
Method was not in force at that time.

South Africa lost their semi-final to England in controversial circumstances when, after a rain delay, the 'highest-scoring overs' rule in use for revising target scores in rain-affected matches revised their target from 22 runs from 13 balls to 21 runs from 1 ball. This rule was replaced for one-day international matches in Australia after the World Cup by a complicated rule in which the score calculated by the highest-scoring overs was reduced by 0.5% for each over lost. This rule was eventually superseded by the Duckworth-Lewis method for the 1999 World Cup.

2006-12-17 17:26:49 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

because of the average.

2006-12-20 02:15:19 · answer #3 · answered by vinni 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers