English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

It's called hypocrisy...US gives nuclear weapons to the countries surrounding Iran and tells Iran not to build a nuclear weapon...Nice message US is sending to the whole world...
Iran,by signing the NPT has the right to have nuclear power,unlike Israel,India and Pakistan who refuse to sign it...More no one can prove that the are building a nuclear weapon...
Iran does not agree with US policies,does not agree with Bush,so they have to be a danger for all the world...since it seems that Bush decides who is good and who is bad in this world...

2006-12-16 20:02:13 · answer #1 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 2 0

Not sure if Pakistan or India should have them becuse of the constant conflick over Kasmire but
it seems both country seems to be acting responcible with their nucular power.

Well

1) Ahmadinejad had said that he believed Isreal
should be whiped off the face of the map
several times and often makes antisemitic statements.He has shown that he will not
peacefully esist with Isreal.He has denied the holacoaust while preaching to radical about
creating a new Holacaoust.

2) He a pretty much a nuisence to most of the Arab countries causing instability in the area.
There is good evidence that he has funded
alot of the insurgent activities in iraq.not all but
enough to be very concerned.Him getting nukes will
distablize the area more since it would make him
a bigger power in the area and a bigger bully.

3) he is known to fund and be involved in terrorist
activities.He has known terrorsit training camp
in his country and welcome with open arms
The chance of terrorist getting hold of a nuke will increase

4) He's has commited himself to radical belief and
no longer to make rational and resonable decisons.One might question his mental stability.


5) he has shown time sfter time he can not be trusted.Trusting him with nukes is just plain stupid.

all the country you listed such as Isreal have
shown to be reponsible with nucular power .Secondly we have very little concern with the above listed with those countries while we
need be very concern about Iran and the above listed concern.

2006-12-17 06:02:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

China and the Soviet Union were also involved in the India Pakistan thing, so the U.S. didn't have unilateral power back then, As for Israel, we don't seem to be allowed to say anything to Israel, because of whatever nefarious behind the scenes powers they have in Washington. It is scandalous that we let them get away with that one, and continue to do so. And BTW, where are the Europeans on this? Why don't they say something?

2006-12-17 04:41:42 · answer #3 · answered by niko 3 · 0 1

The above countries will use nukes defensively. Iran and N. Korea will use nukes aggressively...

2006-12-17 03:01:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 1 2

You can't tell people they can't have them once they've got them. Why has America given Israel the third biggest military in the World?

2006-12-17 04:53:17 · answer #5 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0 1

ugh. bush wants iran , syria , saudi arabia, iraq and isreal , he doesnt want india or pakistan .. WHY ?! because they believe that jesus will come there one day,, america already has isreal and iraq so just sit back and relax watch them making fake exuses to attack iran/syria/saudi arabia one by one ....

2006-12-17 02:55:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

because out of all those countries, iran is the only one that refuses to be politically and economically bullied by the united states.

2006-12-17 02:57:17 · answer #7 · answered by rumpel 4 · 2 3

Possibly because none of those countries ever held our citizens hostage or swore to bring death to us. Granted, we were secretly selling them weapons at the time, so it's hard to tell how serious those claims were.

2006-12-17 02:55:10 · answer #8 · answered by Guelph 5 · 2 2

ummm.. maybe because Pakistan, India, and Israel's leaders haven't stated it's their national policy to kill us

2006-12-17 02:55:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

That is a good question. How would we enforce this ?

2006-12-17 09:02:36 · answer #10 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers