English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

people change. Nobody is the same today as they were years ago. Why can people that have committed white collar crimes or those that a majority of whites do still get a job? Why the hell was whitey in an uproar when OJ was found not guilty ? Maybe he did not do it. When the white actor was recently found not guilty of killing his wife I did not hear about what a travesty it was.

2006-12-16 17:00:33 · 3 answers · asked by 2dang cute 1 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

3 answers

Good points, and there could be a double standard.
One way to approach OJ's acquittal is to consider what the jury saw. They heard the Fuhrman tapes where he made highly derogatory statements about blacks then lied underoath. The lead investigator in charge of the whole case freely admitted in court that he took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it back into the crime scene, which is against police policy. The jury saw a video taken by paparazzi of OJ, Nicole, Denise and their parents talking in a nice peaceful manner right after attending OJ/Nicole's daughter's dance recital - and Denise even kissed and hugged OJ (all this was a few short hours before the murders). There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, car or house consistent with someone who had done this crime in person. The jury saw that the glove truly did not fit - it was the wrong size (heat shinks not moisture). The murder weapon was never connected to OJ or even found. There were no witnesses. The jury was taken to OJ's house and did not see a rumored large blood trail. The book "if i did it" deals with one chapter that is hypothetical and labeled fiction - a great part of the book likely is OJ defending himself against false allegations. Some may disagree with the jury verdict but it's unfair to state with absolute certainty that this person is guilty. OJ has always maintained his innocence.
More reference:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
Top forensics scientist Dr. Henry Lee in his book "cracking cases" provides compelling scientific points that OJ is highly unlikely to be the one who did this unfortunate crime.

2006-12-18 06:22:20 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 1 0

Who knows

2006-12-16 17:08:14 · answer #2 · answered by Nicholais S 6 · 0 0

mam white people in general is ****** up. shhh i here em comin' *smiles and winks*.

2006-12-16 17:06:43 · answer #3 · answered by NONAME 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers