2006-12-16 15:11:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
if you insulters must, pick up a dictionary or preferably an encyclopedia and define liberal. a true liberal. not a fake like most of you insulters.
2006-12-16 15:20:50 · update #1
Yes, he was the last truly liberal one. There have been more liberals, but he was truly liberal.
And to the guy who thinks that the other guy really believes Clinton the most conservative: get some sarcasm skills.
2006-12-16 15:18:57 · answer #1 · answered by Random G 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
listed decrease than are numerous rankings, utilizing multiple criteria from quite some elements, human beings Presidents superb to Worst. searching at a consensus of the right 10, the latest will be FDR. The polarization besides the indisputable fact that, which i trust is your actual question, dates decrease back to extra. In some experience, as a rustic, we've continually been divided. all the in the previous to Jefferson vs Adams, this u . s . has been polarized with few exceptions. From the Federalists vs the Anti-federalists to Republicans vs Democrats, few elections were one sided. yet in a unique way of searching at it, is at the same time as were the most important margins interior the large-spread vote. FDR (1936 24.3% margin) and Nixon (1972 23.2% margin) both received with the help of very large margins interior the large-spread vote, indicating they'd a larger percentage of help from the overall populous than we said in 2000 (-.fifty one% margin) and 2004 (2.4% margin).
2016-11-30 21:01:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you honestly think Clinton was conservative? I know Nixon ran a liberal campaign and the Regan revolution changed the repubs to conservative, but Clinton was a very liberal president.
2006-12-16 15:16:16 · answer #3 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nixon was the original NEOCON!
he was so original, his ideology has its own label. Nixonian-republican.
appeal to the lower class, while trying to grow big government and domestic spying organizations.
must have been Bush's idol, since he has followed in his footsteps and destroyed nearly every Reagan achievement.
2006-12-16 15:42:07 · answer #4 · answered by jj 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, well, he was truly a liberal (price controls, the beginning of detente, the first to introduce the concept of universal health coverage). And Kennedy was truly a conservative (Big tax cuts, strong national defense, staunch anti-Communism). It is kinda strange to consider, if you know history. Similar to the way many Supreme Court appointees reverse their expected politics once they ascend to the court.
2006-12-16 15:22:37 · answer #5 · answered by Emmaean 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
With the domestic spying and the fact than more died in Vietnam under his tenure? That makes him "liberal"?
2006-12-16 15:16:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not based on my understanding of liberal.
EDIT: Oh, never mind. You should talk to my dad. Aren't you a bit young for this view?
2006-12-16 15:13:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Where have you had your head stuck for the last 20 years????
2006-12-16 15:27:56 · answer #8 · answered by Get Real 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hmmm, he did open a dialogue between the US and Communist china. He was also a lying skunk, a trait shared with many liberals.
2006-12-16 15:19:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Sure and Clinton was the most Conservative !
2006-12-16 15:14:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋