What political party would you say that I am with if you did not know me (going on the details here)?

Question

[Foreign relations]
Patriotism is a necessity.
We need a strong military.
Protect America at all costs.
Don't take "bull" from any nation. (Full response to any threat)
Export democracy. (Send out great way of life to other countries)
The nations of the world are either fully on our side, or are a threat to us.

[Domestic Affairs]
Get the 10 commandments back up.
Get rid of cops, and get real soldiers.
We must monitor all forms of communication.
We need a strong but not intrusive government.
Stop the slander of this nation’s leader, by force if necessary.
We need FULL video surveillance in all public buildings and outside.
Give our leaders more control of the country we entrust them to run.
Get rid of ignorant voters. (Either don’t let them vote, or educate them on the topics)

[Economics]
Re-instate the allowance of capitalist trusts.
We must take necessity risks (such as budget deficits) so we can grow.
Cut tax rates in order to stimulate steady, wide-spread economic growth.

LOL, I like that, but there is no "Gangsta Party" in politics.

OMG, I almost forgot, Kill terrorist, NOT baby's!

Answer 1

Your own. When I first started reading I thought you were going to make some point about communism but it doesn't seem like it. What you suggest is simply too far out of the political mainstream to be a major party.

Answer 2

If this were on an exam, I would shame the professor.

It sounds a little bit like Hitler's 1939 Nazi party platform, but not exactly. The same could be said for the democrats, the republicans, Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose Party, Tony Blair's Labour (Liberal) party, or our good ol' whacko constitutional party.

I would also like you to explain what I see as a contradiction here. On one hand you want to give your leaders more control, but on the other hand you need a strong but not intrusive government. As these attributes both involve domestic issues, how can a government be strong and unintrusive?

Just as a thought, does the Patriot act have anything to do with this?

Answer 3

Some type of Republican. You look extreme on paper. Particularly with the police state mentality. Harsh!

As a conservative independent with right leanings, I tend to be completely opposed to your point of view on monitoring communication, surveillance, and soldiers as police.

Very intrusive of government, and I do not trust my government with that kind of power and control.

Please look at some of these things again.

Answer 4

The Gangsta Party Where did you get "not intrusive government' : with all the other crap you have in there? I would also say it sounds like you aren't old enough to vote.

Answer 5

sounds like a police state with no real freedoms... totalitarian dictatorship...

"must monitor all forms of communication"
"get real soldiers"
no freedom of speech
re-education programs

here's a clue buddy... it's NOT A DEMOCRACY IF YOU PUT PEOPLE IN JAIL (re-education camps) THAT DON'T VOTE THE WAY YOU WANT THEM TOO...

see the irony there...

you should read up on naizis... some real similarities there...

but you're way past most republicans...

Answer 6

You sound like a Democrat or a Republican if you are an American.

Conservative or Liberal if Canadian

Labour or Conservative if from the UK

Funny how the major parties actually have a lot of common ground.

Good luck with the voting.

Answer 7

Peoples Democratic Association of the Mentally Ill

Answer 8

Sounds a little fascist to me. It may have its downsides, but at least the trains will run on time, right?

Answer 9

That could be the old school description of both major parties.But it sounds closer to republican today.

Answer 10

I think you're a paranoid schizophrenic bi-polar nut job with an Oedipus complex.