Isn't Jenab6's answer above just priceless! Not only does he recite a litany of half truths and outright fabrications that wouldn't fool the poor kids from the short bus but he then goes on to suggest that those who don't support his idiot dream in the earlier answers are somehow part of the conspiracy. That should tell you all you need to know about the fantasy world that these kooks inhabit.
In their world of imagination you can ignore things like common sense and physics. Engineering skills can be placed aside in favor of a really cool story line and mathematics take a back seat to suspicion and intuition.
Science is not the friend of the conspiracy freak and they know it. That is why they refuse to engage in serious debate and on those few instances where they do interact with the sane among us they resort to claiming that whoever might disagree with them is part of the conspiracy. Just as the JFK conspiracy freaks used to ignore basic facts involving ballistics and state that black was white and plus minus (and in doing so proved their theories to be baseless crap), so the 9/11 conspiracy freaks try to express themselves by using engineering terms which they don't understand. When they banter those terms about they really debunk their own theories without having the knowledge to understand how.
Even leaving aside the questions of engineering and physics questions of common sense, like how a small army of technicians drilling holes in the walls and planting tons of explosives inside the Wolrd Trade Center in the weeks prior to the attacks happened to go unnoticed by everyone who worked there, are unanswered by the conspiracy fruit loops. The reason for this is is obvious, they can't answer them because there is no answer and doing so would destroy their pet theories.
I wonder how it is that these clowns have such a difficult time believing that the terrorists, who take such pride in declaring their achievment on 9/11 of murdering thousands of innocent and defensless men, women and children, actually did attack us?
2006-12-17 13:08:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by mjlehde@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The best evidence of conspiracy isn't whether, or which, US congressmen or senators or public officials have expressed an opinion on the subject. The best evidence is, and always will be, the physical evidence from the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. The conspiracy theorists have an unbeatable case;
1. Tons of powdered concrete scattered over blocks of Manhattan. A fall from a height does not render a concrete block into powder. Explosives, on the other hand, do.
2. The speed of collapse, at nearly the free fall rate, favors the demolition theory and does not favor the pancaking floors theory. In the former scenario, all the floors are cut free at once, hence collapse at freefall speed. In the latter, the inertia of each successive floor impedes the rate of fall, which is therefore at a slower rate.
3. The thick vertical steel support beams were melted or sheared, since otherwise they would have remained upright when the floors collapsed. Jet fuel is modified kerosene, which burns at about 950 degrees Fahrenheit, and that's not hot enough to melt steel.
4. Squibs were observed just before the collapse. Squibs are spurts of smoke and debris caused by the detonation of demolition charges.
5. Explosions occurred at about the same time in WTC compound buildings that were not hit by aircraft.
6. A tall building does not have to collapse into its own footprint. Usually, it takes some careful planning by demolition experts to ensure that this happens. Both WTC towers fell into their own footprints. I doubt that this is coincidence.
All of you anti-conspiracy theorists turn to OPINION, who's willing to say what, who will stick his neck out and what happens when they do, only because the physical evidence is against you and in favor of the conspiracy theorists.
Readers who come along after my answer, notice the time of the question and the sudden long slew of answerers who all made an irrelevant mention of Cynthia McKinney and her even more irrelevant quarrel with a Capitol security guard. Do you think the unanimity and the timing are coincidence, or do you suppose that, just maybe, a few of those answerers were the Asker's shills? Why is stuff like this going on?
Oh, and I forgot to mention that New York's laws require all the evidence at the scene of a fire or building explosion to remain at the scene until the fire marshall can investigate it. But the US government violated those laws in order to haul away a good bit of the sheared steel beams. The US government had those beams carried all the way to CHINA, where they were melted down at once. Why?
2006-12-16 11:36:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
The guy who cleans the toilets (he's a Democrat) believes in the conspiracy theory only he feels that the twin towers were hit by a meteor from outer space directed by a Martian space ship.
2006-12-16 17:53:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by wunderkind 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, the Democrats in Congress do not believe the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
BUT, they encouraged them and promoted them to help them gain Power.
Some Democrats believe that 9/11 was Clinton's fault. That's why they worked so hard to censor the movie.
That's why Sandy Berger stole classified information from the archives.
2006-12-16 10:32:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I agree with g, that both parties would have to be involved.
Think about that, folks! Remember Watergate. Look around here.
Remember the Republicans who have said the war was going the wrong direction.
And the flip-flopper Democrats in Congress (regarding the war).
No way are all these people capable of that kind of agreement.
2006-12-16 10:46:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Personnaly i loved the loosechange conspiracy idea. even with the way precise or incorrect it could be... the truth of the count is, human beings get excitement from some thing to communicate or gossip about. Why no longer? particular rumours are being spread continuously about a variety of of issues. it promises somewhat 'spice' to our lives. all of us have issues to disagree or accept as true with human beings about in lifestyles. i recognize it were given me chatting with my buddies about it, and almost had me believing, yet on the finished of the day, its in effortless words a hearsay and with rumours human beings both believe them or they don't even with the topic. the significant element is, it receives the guidelines operating, and that i get excitement from that! so, its only one among those issues...
2016-11-26 23:09:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe in the conspiracy...
but to answer your question... to believe in the conspiracy, it would seemingly mean that you would have to believe that the majority of government was involved... both dems and repubs...
it would have to be a very wide ranging conspiracy to pull it of, if it happened, most likely...
if you believe in the conspriacy, you probably believe that both parties are corrupt and had a hand in it... if you really believed in it and thought about it...
2006-12-16 10:31:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I don't think anyone believes that. The muslims have been doing terriorists attacks all over the world. Why not the World trade center.
2006-12-16 10:40:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Crazy McKenny believed in it, but she also assaulted a guard, put a bill for impeachment out (which neither party supports) and got voted out of office. Thats the kind of weirdos that believe these theories
2006-12-16 10:36:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
I believe the only one was Cynthia Let Me Assault a Policeman McKinney, but she's gone now.
2006-12-16 10:26:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Scorpion 6
·
5⤊
1⤋