they are two champions legendfs and they are fight crserweights instead of champion i think wwe is doign them worng
DO YOU AGREE WITH ME?????
2006-12-16 10:10:37 · 14 answers · asked by ♥Deadmans Chick♥ 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
SORRY I MEANT AMATURES LIKE MVP HE IS AN AMATURE AND KENNEDY MY BAD I WAS THINKING OF ANOTHER QUESTION
2006-12-16 10:21:28 · update #1
because whoever thinks of the matches, simply sucks. from what i heard, michael cole is a member of the wwe creative thingy. they should think of good ideas that would make it look more entertaining.
2006-12-16 10:50:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well Kennedy and MVP aren't cruserweights. And Kennedy is pretty good as a heel. And at first when he gave an open challenge Undertaker answered and then MVP wanted competition after No Mercy and he got it from Kane. But eventually I think the WWE creative Team should have Undertaker and Kane in better matches for the World Heavyweight Title.
2006-12-16 10:17:21 · answer #2 · answered by Naman B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If established stars were only ever booked with other established stars, how would new stars ever be created? MVP, i agree, is a joke. Mr. Kennedy however, has a natural charisma and is great on the mic. His in ring work has come a long way and he keeps getting better. If Kennedy beat Funaki every week how would he ever be able to become a star? Old stars need to put young guys over so that when the older guys are gone there are young guys to take the top spot. When Undertaker was young (and NOT good in the ring) Hulk Hogan put him over, even dropped the title to him once. Taker is in the stage of his career to do the same and make new stars. This is good booking and good for the growth of the business.
2006-12-16 11:04:39 · answer #3 · answered by r-factor 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well theyre definitely not cruiserweights but they are nobodys. and that why people don care about the fued.
They are just trying to stretch the talent out the wrong way. They have 5 legit main eventers (Kane, Undertaker, Batista, Booker, Benoit) that is enough title fueds for a while
Keep MVP and Kennedy with Finlay, Matt Hardy, Joey Mercury and Greggory Helms and build a really interesting US title division.
It would be a better use of talent and just let the wrestlers move to main even when theyre ready instead of forcing them.
2006-12-16 11:17:30 · answer #4 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the wwe team is listening, here's a suggestion. Undertaker Vs Batista for the title at wrestlemania 23. Get kane to face chris benoit in a pure smash mouth wrestling match. Don't bring this bullshit kennedy and mvp anywhere near wrestlemania.
2006-12-17 04:07:40 · answer #5 · answered by Franchise 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kennedy and MVP aren't cruiserweights they are heavyweights
a cruieserweight is under 200 pounds
The reason Brothers of Destruction aren't battling champions is because Taker is already going to get a title shot at Mania and because Kane is retiring in January
2006-12-16 10:19:07 · answer #6 · answered by Hulk Kogan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You under no circumstances understand, even at the same time as they write my scripts, now and again they placed some thing in there which will be unsuspecting, even though it really is authentic i'm retiring quickly....probable on the right of next 365 days after wrestlemania....and about the streak,it may no longer proceed for the reason that I even don't have any genuine activity in it. Vince plans on letting perchance John Cena win adverse to my undefeated streak and be the actually wrestler to ever defeat it!
2016-10-18 09:27:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is because wwe is building up kennedy and mvp.They are pushing them and that is the reason they have mvp getting cheap wins over kane like in the steel cage match and kennedy getting cheap wins over undertaker such as in the first blood match.
2006-12-16 14:53:02 · answer #8 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kane yes Undertaker no. Kane wrestles full time while Undertaker wrestles 2 months then is away for 2 unless it's a PPV event they need him to appear at. Kane deserves another World/WWE title run
2006-12-16 10:23:07 · answer #9 · answered by Corey B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
cruiserweight lol its funny though kennedy said nobody could beat him thats why. kane mvp is a mystery.
2006-12-16 12:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋