can a lease be broken if not in writ ting?

Question

I started renting to own my house 5 years ago. 2 days ago my land lord informed me i wasnt renting to own but just renting. He named several reasons why he broke the lease. But nothing was ever said to me can this be done.

Answer 1

You have lived there for 5 years with the understanding it was rent to buy. You never stated the reasons he gave you but you need to get a hold of a lawyer.
In some states you lived there long enough to put a claim on the house as the owner. Its called homesteading and its still legal in most states. Doesn't matter who has the deed if you lived there you can claim it as your own.
I knew a gal that did that because she was having a problem with the owner of the house. I never heard of such a thing before but she won and later on sold the house and it was all her money in the return. Check with a lawyer and see if he thinks you can do that too. People who cheat can get the rug pulled out from under them in other ways!

Answer 2

There should have been a written agreement. Absent such agreement, he can do as he pleases. The proper way to structure such a deal is as a lease incorporating an option to purchase, and all the terms of both need to be in the written agreement. The landlord should have recorded a "Memorandum of Option", which need not mention all the terms but must state that a purchase option exists and when it expires. This is the purchaser's insurance that the owner does not sell the property to someone else.

Answer 3

If you had this rent to own agreement in writing, I assume you have a copy, then its binding, he can't just break the lease because he wants too. If you broke a rule in the lease he had to let you know in writing. Don't let your landlord take advantage of you. Get a lawyer before he tries to get rid of you.

If you didn't have the agreement in writing your in trouble because he can do as he pleases. One thing that can save you is, if you kept the rent receipts or copies of money orders or checks that you have made out to him. That would be your only way of proving how long you have lived there.

Good Luck

Answer 4

In the U.S., under the Statute of Frauds all real estate transactions and leases of one year or more MUST be in writing. Without a written agreement, you are renting month-to-month.

Answer 5

Yeah, call a lawyer. I read once that verbal contracts can be binding, but they're a bit tricky. There has to be consideration (money change hands), and a witness (might have been two), there was something else that I can't remember right now.... so call a lawyer. Find one that says quickly that verbal contracts can be enforceable. The ones that tell you "no contract, no deal" just say thanks and look for another.

Answer 6

According to the Statute of Frauds all leases have to be in writing in order to be enforceable. A verbal agreement is unenforceable.

Answer 7

You never had this agreement in writing? Then he can do what he pleases. Do not be surprised if he evicts you next. Since you have no proof of the agreement, it would be your word against his n a court of law. It would be costly to sue him, and there is the chance you would lose. I would move since there is no lease keeping you there.

Answer 8

all your questions are hypothesis. Im specific they are trouble-free qeustions yet my trouble-free assessment is there is not any historic reason to suspect them. the version between Paul asserting he met Jesus and cult leaders is Paul's coaching adhered to Scripture while cult leaders twist Scripture. additionally Paul's ministery became full of miracles. Cultists are con-artists and liars. If there have been some sturdy historic checklist that reported Paul became a cultist or on no account met Jesus that ought to warrant your speculations. Jesus chosen Paul precisely by using fact he became so unfavourable in direction of the church. God continually desires to tutor the international that he can nonetheless create something from no longer something. He took and guy who hated the church and became him right into a guy who enjoyed the church. there became no devotion to God in him. on the Damascus street God created that devotion. yet to in spite of if the apostles had to settle for him or be killed, or if he became the antichrist, why could you even think of this? Im no longer being sarcastic. heavily there must be a physically powerful reason previous, 'i think of it could have been like this.' continually ask in the adventure that your suspicions are warranted by making use of a few information with the information that God is sovereign. by way of the centuries God has provided information that condemned multitudes of fake instructors and cultists. If we've faith he has the capacity to maintain such information we are in a position to confirm if Paul weren't who he suggested he became, we could have the means to indicate to a pair historic information or early church checklist or extra effective-biblical writing. ok heavily, ask your self this question on the grounds which you at the instant are not questioning for sure. If Paul have been nonetheless a bad guy who compelled the apostles to take his Judiastic part why became Paul later persecuted by making use of the Judiazers? Why have been Paul's writings so Christian and not Judaism? you are able to fail as an lawyer by using fact your hypothesis can no longer link as much as any plausible purpose. and added why could Christianity after Paul be so anti-Judiasm if Paul the Judiazer compelled the Christian apostles to circulate his way? that's what I mean once I say you're exciting speculations with out historic reason in any know. I dont techniques human beings questioning CHristianity or perhaps doubting it yet what drives me loopy is whilst human beings willfully decide directly to think of irrationally. the place do you human beings come from?

Answer 9

If its not in writing then how do you know its a lease? Did your printer run out of ink? I'd check, thanks for the inquiry sweety, bye now.

Answer 10

call a Lawyer