The presence of Bush and Blair as leaders of their respective countries is only symptomatic of more deep-seeded problems – namely, the decline of the West. The British Empire has long been in a state of decline, and now the USA, as an empire, has caught up, and, because of lacking structure, has surpassed Britain, and now finds itself deep in the throes of decline as witnessed by the degeneration and decadence all around us. The decline of an empire is marked by excesses (addictions) such as drugs, sex, over-eating, gambling, spending, passive media consumption (TV), etc. Even both of our past two presidents, Clinton and Bush, have had their bouts with excesses, i.e., sex and alcohol.
History teaches us that once an empire enters into decline, this leads to its dissolution. This recently happened to the Soviet Empire – it dissolved back into the many countries that made up the empire. Britain has lost most of its colonies and protectorates and there are advanced secession movements in Scotland and Wales. How a dissolution would play out in the USA is a “big unknown” since the USA was formed in a very unorthodox manner, i.e., immigration over about 300 years from many different countries. A few clues as to how such a dissolution could begin, however, are clearly visible: to wit, the Mexican Atzlan movement, which wants to form a separate country out of America’s southwest, and the massive Cuban presence in south Florida. (The French-Canadian separatist movement in Quebec should also be noted here.)
In the meantime, over the next 30 to 60 years, while this dissolution is crystallizing, presidential and congressional candidates who address America’s growing domestic problems (rather than international issues) will more likely win office. And, since women (rather than men) have a greater acumen for dealing with domestic issues, whether they concern their immediate family or the country as a whole, and, because when an empire declines the males become degenerate first, e.g., former Congressman Tom Foley, America will see more women in leadership positions, e.g., Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House of Representatives. In this regard, Hillary Clinton is a very good bet for the presidency in 2008.
2006-12-16 08:57:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joe Conrad 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What has Cameron produced yet ? Zilch. except lies shifting and shifting messing up on Europe. Ignorant conceited reflects of public self contradiction. did not get everywhere close to aims or a grip on immigration. A dodgy bargains underbelly with Coulson and Brooks. Which also ought to propose rubbing butt cheeks with the police officials. Turning up scratching his gnads AFTER the chav riots. (lol) His defence secretary falsifying a "charity" Atlantic Bridge. And now getting a moist fish slap in the face over Tescos & co. All aboard at the same time as he makes the hash of a life-time with uk NHS ! deliver forth the empty horses he's done of sh!t guy !! i visit inform him to his face anytime he needs and with information.
2016-10-18 09:18:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by canevazzi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No politician is very important in the grand plan of life and time ,all are soon forgotten.
These two Bush and B-liar are particularly mediocre and will be gone and forgotten sooner that most, but will be blamed for a lot of problems they created in the short term, this blame will be placed on them by other politicians who must have someone to blame.
The whole show (circus) will all start again
2006-12-17 19:30:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ian d 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because the worship of anointed power by the common people in the West is what led to this. Deposing Bush without outlawing the class privileges that enabled him will not stop our slide into oblivion. Islam will win, but China will soon exterminate it when that happens.
2006-12-16 08:15:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The planet survived the Permian extinction period, 8,000yrs+, dinosaurs didn't survive the asteroid. These two losers have expiration dates, term limits. Their followers don't. So much irreparable damage has been done, will the Middle east recover? We'll enter recovery as soon as we demand and receive accountability.
2006-12-16 08:15:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by S. B. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not?
Once they recover the "Spoils of the war" that was lost with time left behind after world war two in planet of apes.
Will see how they hit the home-run in planet of apes.
So they better do their home-work first.
Scrap around when ever they saw the tid-bits first.
Other wise the game will be over.
But they will hit the home-run with time in planet of apes.
2006-12-16 20:51:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. In fact, it would be very simple. This is all we need to do:
1) Withdraw immediatley from Iraq (within 2 months all soldiers gone),
2) Issue sincere and profuse apologies for the atrocious arrogance displayed in American invasion of Iraq
3) Treat Palestinians as equal partners in their dispute with Israel.
Then get out and stay out of the foreign intervention business. All of our troubles stem from our incredible arrogance of thinking we are so much smarter and morally superior than the rest of the world.
What are the chances Bush will follow this simple 3 step program?
2006-12-16 08:15:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Course we can,we recovered from a lot more.
Don't forget ,Mr Bush has left the UK,carrying the can for IRAQ.
Now that the U.S.A are recanting on "there failed policy".
Too English by half , us you know,stiff upper lip n all.harumphh.
2006-12-16 07:57:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No the World is changing and this is good it's a bit like asking could the Romans have recovered after Caligula.
2006-12-16 08:13:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by airmonkey1001 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Recover from being the most powerful nation in the world, the richest with the best economy in almost 40 years? I hope not. Look it up instead of just parroting. You might be suprised if you know how to read and listen to the news.
2006-12-16 07:53:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋