in the spirit of "free speech", of course.
Would the New Black Panthers and Nation of Islam adherents be offended if this conference took place in Birmingham, Alabama?
Would you be offended if this gathering garnered world-wide attention?
Is this comparable to Ahmadinejad and Duke's recent event concerning the Holocaust?
2006-12-16 07:15:19 · 10 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The man problem is that the media didn't hold up its end and be responsible. After this holocaust denial crap in Iran, the media should have put pictures out proving that the Holocaust really did happen. Instead, they mostly ignored it (Wolfe Blitzer even had David Duke on his show, sound more like promotion of this ideal...)
Jimmy Carter even advocated this radial holocaust denial thing, and said that it was Israel and the Jew's fault for all the world problems, echoing so many of David Duke's own sentiments
And yet if there was a Slavery denial thing that happened the media would explode with evidence of why slavery really did happen, they'd be condemning it left and right, offering proof, having Sharpton and Jackson on to criticize it, the ACLU, the liberals, and left would be all over it to condemn it and get it stopped. But then its the holocaust, the media is eerily silent...just why is that?
2006-12-16 10:40:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The "free" states had wage slavery. It was worse than chattel slavery if a worker produced more than the slaves and didn't get paid that much more. The slaves got remunerated in the form of food, housing, protection, and medical care--most of which the Northern worker had to pay for out of his wages.
Unions must be mandatory. You're not a man unless you're a union man; you're a slave. Slavery as a Myth should be a left-wing interpretation. If you don't admit that conservative oinkonomics is worse than slavery, you're just trying to pull a fast one by tricking the victims into supporting the Sweatshoppers' Party.
2006-12-16 16:54:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
One is a terrorist group and the other 2 crazy!
They can speak about slavery being a myth, though one would have to be stupid to agree as Washington had them and was having sexual intercourse with them!
There is no doubt the Holocaust happened. My father was in WWII and saw them first hand, as I did in 1951 as a child!
I don't care what other groups say, as long as they aren't violating others rights they can say what they want, though I would hope that mainstream America would not buy that which we know happened!
I am giving a conference on the "Fallacy of atom bombs being dropped on the Japanese during WWII" !
2006-12-16 15:24:31 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely it's comparable. Ahmadinejad is preparing to start WW III, he doesn't care if his whole country dies, he's not interested in victory, he wants to convert the entire world to Islam, and will do this by any means. Have you read his letter to the U.S. citizens? It's very similar to the letter Hitler penned in the late 1930's.
Pretty scary stuff, a crazy man in power.
2006-12-16 15:30:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Good point! That would really expose some hypocrisy. Here's one I'm dead serious about, A Symposium on this B.S. about Israel stealing land from the "Palestinians".
2006-12-16 15:21:34 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Excellent analogy. Keep up the good work.
2006-12-16 15:24:36 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You're absolutely right. It would be very comparable.
2006-12-16 15:24:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It should be held in Harlem.
2006-12-16 15:17:58 · answer #8 · answered by Boaz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course they would.
Of course I would.
Yes.
2006-12-16 15:23:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, yes, and yes.
2006-12-16 15:41:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋