/sarcasm on
Yes we need mandatory hormonal treatments to control crime.
Testosterone is a disease... a virus...
Men fill our prisons, commit the rapes, commit the murders, start the fights, abuse women, molest the children, start the wars, commit the pedophilia acts....
/sarcasm off
2006-12-16 07:14:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
If you outlaw hormones only outlaws will have hormones. Seriously, you CAN'T outlaw hormones - they are a necessary part of life. Without hormones you will be DEAD. And women commit crimes too - that's why they have women's prisons. It isn't the hormones - its the person. I have hormones and I've never been in prison. Men probably commit more homicides because they are taught by conditions to be more violent.
2006-12-16 07:09:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Paul H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't genetically engineer people to become good citizens.That idea is just scary and wrong.
Men are men,including our hormones,we enjoy our human rights.
We have free choice,not all of us commit crime or homicide
2006-12-16 07:09:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't give any ideas. Next time there's going to be a law against people who believes the earth is not flat.
2006-12-16 08:23:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because naturally men are more agressive. But the last thing this world needs is more laws and legislation, especially concerning weirdo science like mandatory hormone treatment
2006-12-16 07:06:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
You should read "The Giver". It is ideas like this one that lead to societies like the one in the book. There is a root problem to all problems. But medication doesn't solve any of them, it just masks the problem at hand.
2006-12-16 07:32:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like you are suggesting jailing all men at birth, or sterilizing them, as a preventive measure against crime.
2006-12-16 07:08:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by bob h 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals will think so. They like to micro-manage every persons life as much as possible, and you can't get anymore micro than this. Any new law they can create to control people's lives, they are all for it.
2006-12-16 07:10:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by lotstodo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe we should look to the individuals responsible, and possibly the parenting.
And I can think of two good reasons to keep them around. You can guess the first.
The second is to co-parent the result of the first.
2006-12-16 07:26:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i'm no guy yet whilst a woman i understand that men do no longer refer to a minimum of one yet another in the bathing room, you need to have had him arrested for crimes against manliness and as for shaking your hand, are you specific it became your hand he had to shake!!??
2016-10-15 01:51:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋