Anyone know of anything that is not a witness or film or still that is good evidence of a Holocaust in Europe?.
2006-12-16 06:21:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Just some pics and film? There is a lot more than "some" pics and film. What evidence do you need? What about the death camps? Those still exist. (The remains- and many are being turned into museums so we don't forget.) And, there are testimonies and diaries from death camp survivors and the soldiers who liberated the prisoners.
2006-12-16 06:30:22 · answer #1 · answered by Malika 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED TO BE CONVINCED?
There is direct testimony of:
1- The Guards/Administrators of the Camps
2- The allied troops who liberated them
3- The Victims themselves
There is physical evidence
1- The records the Nazi's kept. Which have been released. Read through them
2- The camps themselves
By any legal, and moral, standard this did happen.
2006-12-16 08:40:01 · answer #2 · answered by jim 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You just attempted to discredit the evidence of the Holocaust and then asked if anyone had any circumstantial evidence that could definitively prove that it didn't happen. You're an idiot. You would've made thousands of brainwashed Nazi soldiers ashamed to be racist pricks alongside you. Witnesses and survivors and photos and film, were the only credible evidence to prove it did happen. And the same would apply if you were trying to prove that it didn't. And you wouldn't be able to find it, but that's irrelevant. Knock another one off for neo-Nazis and their fight to hate the world as much as they hate themselves and/or their circumstance.
2006-12-16 12:31:43 · answer #3 · answered by Rick R 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In addition to the records kept by the Germans. Toward the end of the war, my wife's Aunt went into some of these camps to assist those yet remaining. She personally saw the ovens and the gas chambers and she took personal pictures.
Those who do not believe that the holocaust happened are fools of the first magnitude.
2006-12-16 06:33:39 · answer #4 · answered by Randy 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Wannsee Conference (January 20, 1942, during World War II) was a high level ministerial meeting of Nazi German civilian government and SS officials convened by Reinhard Heydrich, to bring together the leaders of the German organizations whose cooperation was necessary to carry out the Nazi plan for the extermination of the entire Jewish population of Europe and to make it clear to these other German ministers that this "Final Solution of the Jewish Question" was a strategic imperative of the Third Reich.
The conference was held in the Wannsee Villa overlooking the Wannsee lake in southwestern Berlin.
2006-12-16 06:31:50 · answer #5 · answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Read "Into that Darkness." It is an interview with Stangl, head of the largest concentration camp in Germany. He explains, in rather distugusting detail, how they dealt with the Jews and 'inferior races,' and nearly everything that occurred at these camps.
Anyone who denies the Holocaust should explain the bodies of infants, tossed into mass graves, after being shot in the back of the head. Or mothers who were placed in ovens clutching their children...
2006-12-16 10:56:06 · answer #6 · answered by Sarah A 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A teacher of mine in the eighties. He was a survivor of Auschwitz and what they did to him was inhumane. Dogs at puppy mills were treated better. How those animals are treated is simply inhumane. I remember his tattoo on his arm and I remember thinking "what idiot could really deny this holocaust so well recorded"?
2006-12-16 11:26:22 · answer #7 · answered by the old dog 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Read Primo Levi
2006-12-16 06:41:38 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Auschwitz
2006-12-16 06:36:15 · answer #9 · answered by Sakura ♥ 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How about the bones and the mass graves and the piles of hair from the victims? How about the tatoos on the survivor's wrists, the scars on their bodies?
2006-12-16 06:31:11 · answer #10 · answered by hoodoowoman 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋