English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would there be confusion or would some work on the problems in America actually be done?What do you think and why.

2006-12-16 05:32:59 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

The country would go to hell! Confusion. Really bad day for America... I think a better idea is to start taking better looks at the candidates that are running without regard to their parties. To many people vote straight ticket not really knowing who or what they stand for or ignorant of their track record. For all they know they could be Communist or Nazi activist... Most of the Libertarians would run things on feelings without regard to the cause and effect theorem if they had the chance. Just because it sounds good doesn't mean it is good.

2006-12-16 05:42:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 2 0

What if Ron Paul doesn't run? voting for a Libertarian merely because they're operating because the Libertarian candidate (i.e. Bob Barr), is merely as undesirable as voting for a Republican merely because they're operating as a Republican. you may confess that Bob Barr develop right into a terrible Libertarian candidate. Authored the protection of marriage act. Supported the conflict on drugs, Patriot Act, Iraq conflict, & a ban on Wicca contained in the protection stress. He would have replaced his ideas on those now, yet moves (votes) communicate louder than words. If he develop into extremely a Libertarian, extraordinarily one which develop into nominated for President, he may were adverse to those all alongside, no longer merely at the same time as he necessary to augment his political occupation. I vote in accordance to which candidate perfect represents my perspectives even with partisanship. fortuitously I stay in TX-14, so i am going to get to vote for him no matter if he runs for President. :)

2016-11-26 22:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If we had more views on Capitol Hill, we'd have more viable solutions.

They all might be able to compromise on certain areas when they listen to 3, 4, or more sides of a situation.

2006-12-16 05:35:55 · answer #3 · answered by El Bubba 3 · 2 1

Confusion and Nothing would get done!! These parties
are not experienced enough to run the government.

2006-12-16 05:49:20 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1 0

Democrats would join the newly popular parties in order to steal votes. They would still vote along Democrat party lines.

2006-12-16 05:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 3 1

It all depends on which parties people started to vote for. Hopefully it would just be parties who support the american way, but there are also communist and nazi parties out there.

2006-12-16 05:39:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Martial Law.... you can bet on it, then the shooting starts, that's exactly what the 2nd Amendment is all about.

2006-12-16 08:36:52 · answer #7 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 0 0

There would be a huge random explosion, and the world would come to an end!

2006-12-16 05:37:19 · answer #8 · answered by Pace 5 · 2 1

Pot would probably be legal.

2006-12-16 05:34:52 · answer #9 · answered by Abu 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers