English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is it true that anthropologists have found a weakness that gets bigger with the years on human male chromosomes and females and hermaphroditism get stronger and will be dominant characters in the long future

2006-12-16 05:21:57 · 9 answers · asked by laolala 1 in Social Science Anthropology

9 answers

We both need each other, no gender will dissappear...I think races will evolve and become one eventually.

2006-12-16 08:25:33 · answer #1 · answered by Craiova 5 · 0 1

You are speaking of the book, " Adam's Curse ", by Bryan Sykes. Get this part correct; anthropologist had nothing to do with this genetic find. The Y chromosome, as you know, does not participate in crossing over, except for small parts at the tip that cross with the X chromosome. This leads to a build-up of deleterious mutations that will take the Y chromosome do it's doom; just not that soon. ( hundreds of thousands of years ) The important region on the Y is the SRY region. The regions that are downstream of the SRY's cascade toward maleness are on the other somatic chromosomes. Techniques, in there infancy, exist to bypass the Y chromosome and use the somatic regions. Some experiments with small animals have done this; that is bring the SRY function and the other functions to the somatic chromosomes, where they are safe from the Y's demise. So read the book, do not panic yet and remember that the conclusion Bryan Sykes reaches in his book is only one of many outcomes here.

2006-12-16 14:13:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't males and hermaphrodites both have the XY chromosome and females have XX? If that is the case then how would hermaphrodites continue on if men can not? Are the hermaphrodites going to impregnate us or something? If I had to choose between having sex with a hermaphrodite or becoming a lesbian I would have to choose lesbianism and I think that a lot of other women would too and then we will not be able to reproduce and our existence will dwindle away. Besides, life would really suck without good men here.

2006-12-16 20:13:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Sorry, but women cannot have children without male chromosomes (divine intervention excepted). The chromosomes are not exactly the same. For examples of chromosome disorders involving male and female specific chromosomes, look up Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes.
So, you're stuck with us, sorry.

2006-12-16 10:47:25 · answer #4 · answered by Labsci 7 · 0 0

imagine about it. Hurricanes, droughts, tornadoes and volcanoes have all gotten a lot worse over the superb few years. mom Earth is already attempting to get rid human beings. I said that coach on the discovery Channel too. Very exciting.

2016-11-30 20:40:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Nope. Men will always be bigger and stronger.

And of course, men won't tend to disappear from the earth... if they do, women will disappear as well!

2006-12-16 06:14:48 · answer #6 · answered by Quang 2 · 0 0

Thats because women could continue on without men we can reproduce without ever having sex with a male, but men couldn't continue on without women..

2006-12-16 05:29:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Sure, why not? One day the whole planet's going to be nothing but Lesbo Disneyland...

2006-12-16 05:29:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Nope...

2006-12-16 07:40:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers