Yes, they will until such time that Iran or Syria takes Iraq over and then the bigger government in charge will remain the enemy of the USA
2006-12-16 04:39:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Clarkie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are two examples, Afghanistan and Iraq. Afghanistan was a case of a hollowed-out nation-state getting filled up with a terrorist force called Al Qaeda, most of whom aren't from Afghanistan.
The USA used Iraq as a counterbalance against Iran in the 80s.
The difference is this: Bush and the administration want Iraq to be something on the order of a democratic government, and democracies don't attack each other. Dictatorships, on the other hand, need enemies to survive.
2006-12-16 04:41:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
the U. S. desires to drag out of Iraq and end messing with Iran, because Iran has nuclear guns and would really spoil most of the U. S.. Islam is a very complicated faith yet we do not have any good to guage one faith depending off of what a number of that's followers trust. The note Jihad actual ability a war for the reason behind faith which basically would nicely be a debate. Islam isn't all about treating women human beings badly. some Islamic women human beings like the way they are dealt with, each from time to time Islam protects that's women human beings. yet in some strict Islamic international locations women human beings are mistreated. What we as human beings imagine about Islam is what we see on television, and interior the files. yet we do not understand sufficient to guage the religion.
2016-11-30 20:37:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by plyler 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's very possible.
The problem with U.S. foreign policy ever since the Cold War is that it's been infused with realism, highly mediatized survive-till-next-week politics and an ever-growing influence of the corporate sector in the political process.
Politicians - except for a few exceptions - don't care about long term. They don't particularly care about shaking the public's delusions either. And they certainly don't care about the crisis that will face the next guy in office. (It's not just the U.S. - most modern democracies suffer the same disease, the U.S. just has much more power to throw around and a culture that tends to be more insular)
This is why over the years, the U.S. has given its assent and support to such lovely people as Saddam Hussein, Pinochet, Noriega, etc, etc... Today, the U.S. is arming a whole bunch of people it shouldn't even be dealing with (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia (far from an example of democracy and the origin country of most 9/11 terrorists), people in Afghanistan who used to be involved in genocide, etc, etc...)
2006-12-16 04:45:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
sooner than that i would think. if there is a free and fair election there will be a Shina dominated government who will be allied to Iran. the best option for the US would be a military regime, much like Saddam's. and there's a good probability that the US will be involved in some conflict with Iraq because Saudi Arabia will see Iraq with a Shina government as a threat and will continue to finance and supply arms to the Sunni insurgents, as they are doing now. Iraq will take action against Saudi Arabia and the US will step in to protect them. if you poke a stick in a hornets nest expect to get stung.
2006-12-16 04:49:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought the list was already made and that George Bush is checking it twice. You better be concerned about now and not 15 years down he road. Think about all the times between Georgie Jr. and his father's reign in the 90's . How many enemies does the US really have excepting the ones they have invited along the way?
2006-12-16 04:48:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brian H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good possibility of it. We do tend to see a pattern of the people we help put into power turning on us. We helped to put the Taliban into power in Afghanistan Now we are fighting against them I can see a similar situation happening with Iraq
2006-12-16 04:48:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but it could become the Saudi royal family`s worst nightmare. In Saudi Arabia the majority of their people are one religious group and the Royal family is another. Iraq could rule with the Saudi`s majority religious group and spread to overthrow the family. Bush is protecting Saudi Arabia.
2006-12-16 04:47:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Probably..in about 5 years time
After the Brits and Yanks have gone Home a few years
2006-12-16 04:41:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by uksawatdii 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, don't be silly. The one thats in place now is nothing but a puppet regime put in place by Bush co, so if its replaced it will just be puppet regime II.
2006-12-16 04:46:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Third Uncle 5
·
0⤊
1⤋