Or just an accident??
2006-12-16 04:07:13 · 22 answers · asked by Cap10kirk 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
If you consider how much of a cover up was going on it is fairly obvious.
#The driver wasn´t totally drunk otherwise the body guards from both persons wouldn´t have let him drive.
#The blood sample of the drive contained an amazing ammount of carbondioxide, on the same day in the same area a man who was drunk killed himself with the exaust into the car trick, they swapped blood samples.
# Diana was with a muslim! she was chosen to be charles wife and to produce kids because of her blood line. Can´t be having the blood line poluted can we now!!
2006-12-16 04:27:59 · answer #1 · answered by Ganymede 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No she was not according to last report but the driver was the one responsible drunk and on drugs ..They say her car was touched by a Fiat I have never know a little fiat catch a top range BMW let alone knock it off the road . The more outcome of a collision of those 2 cars would be the Fiat coming off worse.Dia was a good time girl .If not she would not have been at that place at that time.She couldn't hack the royal job.Camila can and that is the truth of the whole saga .Di by what she was doing was not very good for the boys a bad example.She didn't think about them when out night clubbing it .Did she not fall out with her own Brother cause she could not have villa right near the main entrance of her family home so she could court the press ,She did some good things and some not so good things.If Camila looked like Di people would not say unpleasant things about her.But looks come first as usual This is how it was and is .
2006-12-16 04:45:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Reminds me a little of the Kennedy Assassination more than 40 years ago, though I remember it well.
There must be something in the human mind that cannot deal with reality. No matter how much evidence is produced, no matter what is concluded, people just ignore the facts and continue to ask in a parrot style manner, "Was he/she murdered or was it an accident".
Sometimes we don't find out. My common sense tells me that we have had the truth on the Diana question for 10 years. How long it takes some people to believe it is another matter.
2006-12-16 04:15:10 · answer #3 · answered by Raymo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hello,
The evidence is TOTALLY 100% clear, how many more times does it have to be reported in the press, media, TV, before it is believed?.
**It was a car crash, the vehicle was traveling approximate 61-63mph in the under pass tunnel, the drive lost control due to excess alcohol (2-3 times over the UK legal limit in his blood stream) in combination with prescription drugs. Result!! death by drink driving & crash.
**The fact that Mr. Mohammed Al Fiad cannot accept the death of his son Doddie & Diana is very sad. He is looking for a cause or blame that doesnt exsist. He (Mr. Al Fiad) is still in denial of his loss and hasnt grieved deeply for his son, if he had he wouldnt be pursuing these frankly mad paranoid ideas of a conspiracy theory. But there again Mr. Alfiad is just a mad attention seeking nutter all be it a very rich one.
IR
2006-12-16 04:25:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'd favor to trust that it replaced into basically an twist of destiny yet after observing some issues as we talk it basically would not upload up. Why would the motive force have had a lot carbon monoxide in his equipment? Why did he force faraway from Dodi's apt. if that's the position they were going? Why did the police not seal off the tunnel to be investigated longer extremely of having it power washed and open with in 4hrs.? Why received't they enable the drivers kin have a dna try performed to make confident that is his blood that they try out? both the motive force of Diana's motor vehicle and the motive force of the white little motor vehicle stumbled on were both pushed with the help of adult males linked with MI6 and there are inquiries to the single drivers suicide, if he's extremely useless. i extremely favor to imagine that's is a procedures fetched that the royal kin would have her killed yet they do unusual issues perpetually. She upstaged them.
2016-11-30 20:37:19 · answer #5 · answered by plyler 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A drunk drugged driver (employed by Al Fayed ) crashes a car in a tunnel at 100 mph in the centre of Paris. Agatha Christie would have struggled to make that murder.
2006-12-16 04:17:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No it was a tragic accident, this morbid constant re-examination of a self-explanatory incident simply sickens me. Could the idiots who still insist that a royal family which occupies merely a figure-head position could have ordered such a high profile murder please remove themselves from the gene-pool for the sake of us all?
2006-12-16 08:40:30 · answer #7 · answered by hogi_bear99 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think there is something behind the accident besides being stalked by papperazzi . I always felt that the royal family was somehow involved it was all to coincidental how it played out.
2006-12-16 04:54:04 · answer #8 · answered by mamiluv6969 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Murdered
2006-12-16 04:10:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
nah she wasn't murdered, they just finished the trial i believe last week and they came to the conclusion that it was just a car accident. it wasn't purposely done, just an accident.
2006-12-16 04:15:17 · answer #10 · answered by Nay Nay 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋