Any good person is always at peace with himself but at war with his/her surroundings or people. Anyone claiming that he/she is good and everything around him/her is good as well, is doing nothing except fooling him/herself. So, it is time to come up and say loudly if you are an evil, good or a hypocrite!!!
2006-12-16 03:44:46 · 9 answers · asked by Amir 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
yes I can. I am a good person. My heart is true and I would never intentionally do wrong. I as a person am good because my intentions are good, but the human in me allows me to make mistakes.
2006-12-16 03:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm often a hypocrite. I want to do the right thing and sometimes end up choosing the selfish action over the right thing when I am feeling affronted or offended.
Your definitions are too simplistic.
Not all good people are at war with their surroundings; many good people move through their surroundings offering comfort and aid to those who are suffering. That is not being at war. That is creating change my moving the forces of the world in a different direction gently.
Not all bad (and especially not EVIL) people claim they are good and think that the world is good about them. While naivete is injurious to a person over time, there is no inherent badness in viewing the world positively. Those people can affect positive change by offering their outlook to others who need to see their problems from a different perspective.
To find inner peace, one has to follow their dao and show by example the positive of it. However, as a hypocrite, I consider that people who wander off accusing others of being good, evil, or hypocrites by your criteria is vastly ignorant of truth and should be ignored by everyone except self-righteous hypocrites.
Like me (well, and you, too).
2006-12-16 03:56:27 · answer #2 · answered by Jess B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If your analysis of a 'good' person is correct (which I doubt) then I am a good person.
Remember, Charles Manson was at peace with himself, a charismatic character who attracted a posse of women to his peace-and-love farm in the sixties, yet he was also at war with his surroundings and the people who inhabited them Just look what he did?
According to your criteria, Manson would be classified as a goody-too-shoes.
2006-12-16 03:57:17 · answer #3 · answered by Panama Jack 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i understand this is going to sound as if i'm straddling the fence in this concern yet fairly i'm no longer. i have self belief matches like the up coming Shawn Michaels vs Batista grudge tournament would make large 2 out of three falls tournament and many non identify matches. yet Championship matches ought to proceed to be the way they are. Contenders ought to get actually one shot on the identify ,and in the journey that they lose step aside and promises some one else a threat. as well now a days with rematch clauses and variety one contenders matches they are like 2 out of three matches only no longer interior of a similar tournament.
2016-10-18 09:08:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You left out the 4th kind of person:
Those who want to stuff everybody into three categories. Like you.
Human behavior is way to complex to try and boil it all down to 3 arbitrarily chosen labels. Wake up and smell the diversity :)
2006-12-16 03:48:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
just a thought. There are few people who are not somewhat hypocritical. It is a matter of how hypocritical we are.
2006-12-16 03:47:00 · answer #6 · answered by lefty 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe everyone is a combination of all three, including myself.
2006-12-16 03:47:17 · answer #7 · answered by Ophelia 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
im a very VERY bad girl lol hahahehee
2006-12-16 03:50:46 · answer #8 · answered by sexxi_tami_13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont judge me... but i assume that this isnt right... good bad hypo thing.....
2006-12-16 03:48:18 · answer #9 · answered by babyyocca 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋