English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a question mainly aimed at people who think male sex offenders should be castrated:

What do you think is a suitable punishment for female sex offenders?

2006-12-16 01:32:54 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

18 answers

They should be sentenced to 5000 hours community service at a boy's school, helping with swimming lessons and assisting the school nurse with physical examinations.

2006-12-16 15:25:42 · answer #1 · answered by Jadis, Queen of Narnia 2 · 1 1

Well, you have female circumcision, however, I think that castration is a bit extreme unless this is a repeat offender that is molesting children, in which case, they shouldn't be allowed out of prison at all, which means that castration isn't needed. Many many people are convicted of sex offenses for minor things, and I like how you are after the female aspect, very good question.

Really, you take a piss outside and you can be a sex offender, someone can lie about there age and your going to prison, and someone can just make up something. Our laws ar too strict for minor offenses.

For one example, I have a friend who is now a registered sex offender, he went to prison for a few years and will have to register with the police everywhere he goes, so what did he do?

He went into a laundry [lace late at night to pee, and didnt lock the door, a lady opened the door and screamed, he freaked and turned around to see what was going on, and she just happened to get a glance at his package.

Anyways, not an exact answer to your question, but I think that castration could go a little far, as opposed to a life sentence in prison for repeat offenders. Also, if you take away the sex ability from a person, male or female, that has an obsession and is performing sexual offenses, they will probably aspire to find a new way of getting off, torture, murder, etc. A lot of cases of people that had sexual fantasies that just took them further especially if they couldn't operate better.

2006-12-16 01:50:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I really wish people who pose these questions would be more specific, because using the words "sex offender" whether male or female implies in our society that they have molested or raped a child. That, however, is patently false. There are half a million people in the US required to register as a sex offender and at least 15 percent have molested or raped a child.

I probably shouldn't be answeing this quesiton because I do not think castration is humane. Does that mean we chop off the hands of shoplifters? It's medieval, injhumane and crueMF

2006-12-19 15:24:12 · answer #3 · answered by Shelley 3 · 0 0

I can say from experience, sex offenders will still 'rape' kids, or women, even if castrated. There are many, many ways of raping someone, and it doesn't always include the s** organs (other things can be done to rape somoene). So, how would castration help anyone to stop raping anyone, adult or child? It wouldn't! Plus, this is something messed up in their heads, not in their organs. Something has gone haywire in their brains to make them like things like that. Plus, it's about power and control over someone helpless. It's not about pleasure.

I know this probably sounds sick, but what I personally think should happen to them is have them have happen to them what they did to others, then lock them up forever--where they will be raped for the rest of their days as this is what is done to sex offenders in prison, or kill them. They will never change. It isn't a matter of choice for them. They can't turn it on and off. I think that this should be for men or women that are sex offenders. I think it's the only ways to get through to them that this is not ok in society. They are sick and no amount of help is going to help them.

2006-12-16 16:21:26 · answer #4 · answered by honey 6 · 0 0

I used to think they should be castrated, but then I learned they have tried that in other countries and the sexual offenders still wanted to perpatrait. The reason being? It was always a controling and manipulative thing, not a sexual thing, the sex part was just in the head-

So now I think they should all be hung, or basically killed, male or female, so their genes will not pass on any further than they already have-

2006-12-16 05:52:40 · answer #5 · answered by allaboutme_333 3 · 1 0

I am not in support of sex offenders whether they are female or male. But society has always labeled a women as someone who is nurturing, a caregiver, etc. I don't mind being labelled that. I am, however, disappointed to find there are so many women who have taken that label and ripped it to shreds. Being a victim of child abuse I always thought if anyone ever hurt my daughter I would want to kill them. The same is true for my son. It should not be any easier for a woman to get away with robbing a child of his innocence than it would be for a man.

2006-12-16 04:40:39 · answer #6 · answered by juju baby 2 · 2 0

Female offenders should be forced to wear ankle bracelets at all times. This should be monitored by an agency daily to see where this person has been - such as school, mall, etc. This will help in determining if crimes were committed in those areas while the offender was in the area.

2006-12-20 01:36:04 · answer #7 · answered by Niraj N 1 · 0 0

Personally I think all sex offenders should be made to weat a sign around thier necks anytime they leave thier house saying "I raped a child"...but in this day and age of political correctness that will never happen...the logic seems to be that the criminal has more rights than the victim...which i personally think is bullsh*t..i also think that they should bring back public stocks in the town square for punishment for these sick f*cks...lock them in with a sign and let the public do as they wish(if ya think about it...there wasnt over-crowded prisons back then...maybe that actually worked????)

2006-12-16 01:44:42 · answer #8 · answered by hoagie13365 3 · 4 0

No I in all probability would not yet then i understand that castration des no longer get rid of this style of behaviour carried out by making use of intercourse offenders (this would not mean i do no longer in simple terms like the belief of severe punishment for those crimes). the muse of the project for intercourse offenders is often psychological and fairly commonly they see their behaviour as "organic" or that they have executed no longer something incorrect and castration would not get rid of this questioning. besides the very incontrovertible fact that, it may act as a deterrent for multiple them. individually I say build an island in the midst of the sea as a strategies removed from civilisation as plausible and go away them there to contemplate what they have executed. and that they could on no account have the means to do it back! Indigo

2016-10-15 01:34:36 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

what i think should happen to them male or female is they should be put in a room and at any time during the day or night this person would come in and do things to them that they would not like. then i think they should be made steril so they can never have kids of there own and then i say lock them up for the rest of there lives and if that isnt possible then on there 4head they should have a sign that says i rape kids...

2006-12-16 14:58:25 · answer #10 · answered by crazyme 5 · 1 0

the same as a punishment for the male offender.

2006-12-16 04:09:13 · answer #11 · answered by comic book guy 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers