That wont happen lol be funny if it did. Cant beleive Batista agreed to beat him Kane and Randy Orton said no cause they have respect for him. And Undertaker couldnt go to TNA as undertaker due to the name being owend by the wwe just like kane its a trademark y do u think The dudley boys arent called that anymore .
2006-12-16 01:43:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gavin C 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
That would be incredibly greedy on Batista's part. I'll probably hate him for not speaking up. Superstars like Ric Flair, Orton, and Kane have pushed the offer to beat 'Taker because of their respect for him, and the fact that a person like Taker doesnt deserve to lose. Making Batista win is f**ked up and a total whackjob. Vince is capable. The one thing Vince lacks is appreciation. That's why Austin walked out. That's why The Rock had an argument with him. That's why Bret Hart was screwed. That's why HBK had to kiss Vince's @$$ in public. Batista might win at Mania, but when the time comes Vince will turn him into a joke too. The Undertaker should never lose, and doesnt deserve to go to TNA like that.
2006-12-16 05:33:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rockafella 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
If Vince made The Undertaker lose at WM23 then that would be the death of vince and the death of the wwe to lose a superstar of that caliber the way that they will lose him if he loses at wm.I mean I dont think taker will go to TNA but he will probably retire if they dont let him at least go 15-0 at wrestlemanias because from what I have heard the whole wrestlemania think was in his contract from the beginning of time.
2006-12-16 05:20:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris L 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Taker ain't going to tna and taker will beat batista for a win of 15-0
2006-12-16 01:26:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by MAF1113 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The one thing that should left in tact forever is that Mark Callaway be allowed to retire as the only man ever to not lose at WM why have him build such a record just to have him lose at WM for the sake of other talent to try and build a career off of. Your idea is interesting but knowing Vince he will allow taker to lose to someone who won't have half the career Taker has had
2006-12-16 02:30:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Corey B 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
They are only saying Undertaker would lose at W23 to not give away the finish. The undertaker will win W23 and go out on top. Then they will start a Tournament to see who should get the title since it is vacant, this is were they will have a no name win it to push them has a superstar. Thank you and good day
2006-12-16 06:44:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by BillyStone 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
orton is the basically one with expertise in there, yet cena evens that out at the same time with his lack off ability. atleast batista adjustments it up once in a lengthy time period, and taker has a funky enterance, yet takers retiring next 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. if i had to make certain between both, i vote for the latter of both.
2016-11-30 20:31:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the storyline is for taker to loose and go insane and leave wwe with his last match at survivor series next year against vince
2006-12-16 02:17:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Reeshad 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
IF "TAKER LOSES" I WILL NOT BE HAPPY!!!! SO OL'VINNY-BOY HAD BETTER WATCH IT!...BUT, IF MY MAN DOES RETIRE OR LEAVES WWE I HOPE HE DOES GO TO TNA AND MAKE THE RATINGS SKYROCKET!!!!
TO THE PERSON WHO SAID THAT "SCREW-JOB " WOULD'NT BE AS BIG, IT WOULD BE BIGGER!!!!!!
2006-12-16 06:35:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are you trying to take one of the last decent WWE wrestlers away?
Bad idea.
2006-12-16 03:29:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ash 5
·
2⤊
0⤋