English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Iraq is invaded in order to free the citizens from the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein. But things got worst that Saddams regime even worst than ever. Invasion army cannot control even baghdad alone. Before the invasion all Iraqi people are living in their houses, but now they are living in camps indifinitely. Iraqi children are not going to school, have no food, pleasure and whatever a child need at a stage of childhood. How can a child living in camp, whose house, school, and joy was brutally destroyed feel against those who causes all these to him. Some high percentage of Iraqi children are fatherless. No electricity, no security, no peace, no water, no transportation, no rest, no healthcare facilities, no job, no, no, no, no.................. Is that the freedom bush have been talking about? IT CAN'T BE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

2006-12-15 22:25:04 · 12 answers · asked by muzyne 3 in News & Events Current Events

It is also seen that the current Iraqi government is not the choice of Iraqis. It is amerika imposed government to Iraqis. Behind that it is also seen that any democratically elected government that refuse to say 'YES' to bush's foreign policies is declared as illegitimate and not guinuen. All those non democratic governments that are able to complay and follow step by step the needs of amerika are allowed to live. Examples Chavez and Musharraf respectively. There is no true deomcracy in the eye of bush, but selfishness, greed and injustice

2006-12-15 23:01:50 · update #1

12 answers

Look at who the Bush regime has been invading and you'll see the picture starting to emerge -- but only if you're aware of a few rarely publicized facts.

1) Afghanistan is situated between Turkmenistan and the sea. Turkmenistan has the largest remaining oil reserve in the world.
2) Oil is priced in dollars. This practice requires all oil-buying countries to maintain reserves in U.S. dollars. That enables the U.S. to keep a $8 TRILLION debt.
3) Pricing oil in U.S.$ is artificially keeping the U.S.$ stronger than it should be based on real GNP.
4) Iraq and France began pricing oil in euros in 2002. That practice ended with the invasion and take-over.
5) Iran would like to set up an exchange for euro-priced oil. Nuclear is just the excuse that the U.S. is using.
6) Taking Iraq's oil supply off-line has slowed China's industrial and economic growth significantly. It had been estimated that China would overtake the U.S. in five years. That estimate is now 15.

These occupations were never about freedom or instituting democracy. They are all about manipulating world markets so that the U.S. doesn't have to pay the price for its unsustainable economic and industrial policies.

2006-12-15 22:56:42 · answer #1 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 2 1

I feel all the killing is and was totally unnessary, Hussin was a crule dictor but there was much less blood shed then. Now with the born again Christian Bush we are losing thousands of our brave troops. Many thousand innocent Iraqie lives there standard of living has gone down the tube. Now how does America get out? We have created a civil war that could spread to more mid east countries. America's congress should impeach Bush and Cheney, throw Rice out too.

2006-12-15 23:01:42 · answer #2 · answered by lonetraveler 5 · 2 0

How do you outline "terrorist" or "freedom fighter" for my section a terrorist is all of us man or woman who's prepared to incite worry to push an agenda. lower than that definition, any kind of gang bangers right here interior the U. S. is a terrorist. Then a freedom fighter is someone who engages in lively strive against with the forces of a political entity that's oppressing them or implementing unfair regulations and taxes. the version is the liberty fighter basically fights the forces of the opposing authorities, they are rebels genuinely. you need to take a seem on the yankee civil conflict for an get at the same time of ways this argument ought to roll - A accomplice soldier replaced right into a freedom fighter to the south, yet a terrorist and a insurrection to the Union. Likewise, plundering and pillaging Union squaddies will be seen terrorist to the electorate of the Confederacy. i imagine the argument comes right down to that there is a logical fallacy to "both, or" wondering. some arguments are black and white (both this, or that). yet many at the on the spot are not and are extremely in colors of gray. thus, someone would nicely be both a terrorist or a freedom fighter, or they'd nicely be both and one or the different interior the eyes of a few different person.

2016-11-30 20:28:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

America is only for democracy abroad if its in the interests of national security. There was a shi'ar uprising in 1990 that foundered without any US help.

I think everyone knows that America isnt interested in bringing peace its just after maintaining a supply of oil. The whole notion of preventive war since America felt threatened by Iraq is ridiculous. Iran and North Korea are both threatened by the states? Does that give them the write to bomb America or invade it? The double standard could lead to World War 3.

2006-12-15 22:40:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The attitude shown by some people here makes me absolutely sick.
The war against Iraq is illegal and criminal, and serves no purpose other than fatten some already immensely rich companies even more, at the expense of the ordinary citizen in the US, as was pointed out before.
The Iraqi people and their fate don't concern these people in the slightest as long as they can keep on driving their SUVs.

2006-12-16 02:55:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

There are so many experts on here going on about Bush and Blair and the middle East. We voted for these people to do our dirty work for us. Let them get on with it. Unless you have been to the Middle East, you have no idea what it is really like. Most postings on here are based on what has been seen on TV or has been printed in the paper. Seriously what qualifies you to make these assumptions. Why not get a job in politics and rise to power, then you can go there yourself and sort all the problems out. On second thoughts you wouldn't make it as your English is appalling and you have to write properly if you are going to lead a country.

2006-12-16 00:04:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

you just discovered one of the reasons why americans now a days are hated all over the world

2006-12-16 18:19:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Elementary my dear Watson.It is, as you say, a right mess.What to do though, what to do.?

2006-12-15 22:37:04 · answer #8 · answered by pageys 5 · 0 0

America "brung them freedom" !!!

America claims absolute moral authority over every other nation on earth, didn't you know that?

2006-12-15 22:27:53 · answer #9 · answered by Not Ecky Boy 6 · 1 2

iraq was invaded because bush hated sadam for trying to have his dad killed not for anyother reason.

2006-12-15 22:32:38 · answer #10 · answered by scooprandell 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers