English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Few days back ur Foreign office spokesperson Ms. Tasnim Aslam declared that "Pakistan never claimed Kashmir as her integral part"

My question is “”How it can be a disputed when you doesn’t claim that part as your integral part?“”

Why the hell u are fighting with India from last 60 years on Kashmir when you think it’s not your integral part?
Why you all the time blame India on this issue?
Why you attacked 3 times on India and imposed 3 wars on her?
If this is not their integral part then why they are keeping their army in Azad Kashmir and holding illegal occupation over there?
Why doesn’t you just delete the word “K” from Pakistan as the word “K” denotes Kashmir in your country’s name?

http://www.dawn.com/2006/12/12/top3.htm

Please answer with reasoning, if you don’t have any valid points then don’t answer to increase your 2 points.

2006-12-15 21:38:17 · 6 answers · asked by Eccentric 7 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

Just after the creation of Bangaladesh President Zulifikar Ali Bhutto entered an agree ent with the then Indian Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi at Simla. According to that accord, Pakistan got back all the lost lands in the war in Western front and recognised the pact in which the claims of pakistan were totally closed and sealed once for all. But the unscrupulous politicians at Pakisthan and a number of Islamic organisations reopened the sealed box and encouraged terror gangs' growth and abused Indians with vulgar langauage!!!!

Till they are doing it at the expense of the rich middle east supports. Once these supporters show their shoes, everyhting will cooldown...Till they blow hot ...more hot and hot.....

2006-12-15 21:51:47 · answer #1 · answered by SESHADRI K 6 · 4 0

Here is a solution,why not let the people of Kashmir decide who runs thier tiny little state,you may be surprised, they may want to run thier own country, with niether of the two near nieghbours taking any part of thier evolution, being the biggest, with more weapons is not always best,take as an example Monaco, Lichtenstien, very small in land mass with little or no agriculture,or manufacturing base ,these countries play to the strenghs, with a very small tiny armed services that are mainly ceremonial,yet they are two of the wealthiest countries on earth per head of population, I have never visted Kashmir but many other countries do well out of tourism, there is an old saying in the advertising industry that states; 'if there is not a need, then create one'. regards LF

2006-12-15 23:16:29 · answer #2 · answered by lefang 5 · 1 2

Did you read on? It was a statement made to compliment and support President Musharraf's speech..

The Simla Pact is still followed and it- to the best of my info- did NOT carry any thing that annulled Pakistan's claims over Kashmir (which as a matter of fact - like u said too - is the K in Pakistan)! All earlier maps of pakistan always incorporated Kashmir.. it was natural! Kashmir is GEOGRAPHICALLY linked with pakistan, RELIGIOUSLY it has a Muslim Majority making it natural part of pakistan as per the partition plan!

Now all these new developments are Musharraf's radical plans that he want to impose to please Uncle Sam.. one of the things that has earned him the title Bush-arraf.

All we can do now is to keep our fingers crossed and pray to Allah to bless this nation and grant some sanity to its rulers (and their spokespersons!)

2006-12-20 09:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by Shariq M 5 · 0 1

problematic step. seek over search engines like google. that might help!

2015-04-28 18:34:19 · answer #4 · answered by Patricia 2 · 0 0

very confusing point. research into search engines like google. this will help!

2015-04-28 16:38:48 · answer #5 · answered by Grace 2 · 0 0

well it is not their integral part, but they would like to have it anyway.

2006-12-16 18:19:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers