I do. I have dreams about it all the time, where they have her eyes, my nose, her hair, my lips... Things like that.
We've even discussed getting artificial insemination with one of her eggs in my body. There was even discussion if seeing if one of my eggs joined with one of hers wouldn't make a baby girl in the near future, but even I'm not sure if that would work, or how.
Eh, you're not the only one. Just so you know. <3
2006-12-16 02:12:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
of direction there is a few conflict and scarcity of achievement in final married, yet you in simple terms ought to weigh that against the positives (which it style of feels you have already got). Bringing yet another female into the dating would not be cheating if (and provided that) the two you and your husband needed that, and agreed to it. yet there are a number of reasons to no longer circulate down street- introducing a third guy or woman to any dating opens up an entire new international of capacity conflicts. attempting to maintain a secret like it relatively is in all probability to reproduce resentment over the years. in step with probability no longer even on a unsleeping point, even nonetheless it relatively is unavoidable- it may in simple terms fester once you're caught attempting to disclaim your self, on a daily basis of your life. you have got here upon something approximately your self which you will no longer undiscover- besides the very incontrovertible fact that what you have defined would not sound like a lesbian- it sounds extra such as you're bisexual. specific, you are able to stay married and have a physically powerful life- yet don't think that being in one in each and every of those concern would not be a source of a few stress. extra from attempting to maintain a secret than from resisting the temptation to stray- it relatively is something all married human beings handle. it particularly is a case the place i could say being open and straightforward consisting of your spouse is in all probability the terrific direction of action, in any different case he's going to be at a loss for words, pissed off & by making use of your protecting him in the lifeless of night. And if the very fact indirectly got here out later, it may harm far extra.
2016-10-15 01:22:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by archuletta 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I do wish it were so, and I know what you mean. In fact, I wish any number or people could make a baby, you know? Gay men, lesbians, a caring, small group of people, putting a little bit of themselves into the child and sharing that bond. And, of course, for ease's sake- not having to get artificial insemination and all that, like you mentioned.
I had no idea this was such a big issue until I watched "If These Walls Could Talk 2" to hear Ellen Degeneres' character seem very genuinely upset about not being able to impregnate her partner- how it felt very much like a failure to have to resort to another person, and not keep it between them. It was very interesting to learn.
My hopes go out to you.
2006-12-15 21:02:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Last year in my anatomy class we actually learned about something like this. I don't remember the specifics but basically the way that it would work would be that they would the genetic info from one egg and put it into the other egg and place it in one of the women's uterus. Because women only have X chromosomes, the only sex that two females could have would be another female. Unfortunately this process will never work for two men because the most important parts (egg, uterus) are only found in women. It would be wonderful if this could happen by natural means, but this is the closest that we have gotten... yet.
2006-12-15 20:19:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by loveismyreligion 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think researchers are working on it as we speak. The Rockefeller Foundation offered the first man who could carry a fetus to term $1,000,000 back in the 1960s. Hasn't happened yet. Now they've added the first woman to impregnate another woman to the gift list. Of course, it would involve a totally successful opposite-gender sexual organ transplant. Who knows...
2006-12-15 20:02:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I would have had the money, something kinda like that could have been a possibility for me. I'm a MtF transsexual and a lesbian. If I would have had the money to have sperm preserved when I started to transition, it could have been possible for me to be in a lesbian relationship and have a child that is biologically both of ours.
2006-12-16 17:34:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by carora13 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I' not a lesbian but I think if 2 men or 2 women can make babies, that would be kinda cool. I believe if your happy with that person man and man or woman and woman then don't let the government stop you. If you want a baby with her, their is always adoption.
2006-12-15 20:05:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by audrey 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know. I like being able to make love to my girlfriend and not have to worry about getting pregnant.
2006-12-16 05:02:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scully 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the same thing for gay men... sometimes.
Only though because too many straight people have ruined the magic of reproduction. Quality, not Quantity!
Also I think straight people that can't make kids because of biological reasons agree with you as well.
2006-12-15 22:10:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
What if this, what if that, what if you could just do whats right in the first place. Not agreeing with your lifestyle does not make me a homophobe, it just says I disagree with you and your lifestyle. Ignoring the truth only leaves yo in the dark, your life will always be complicated.
2006-12-15 20:19:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by act as if 4
·
2⤊
3⤋