Suck without T.O.?
2006-12-15 18:57:02 · 7 answers · asked by coco puffy. 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No. In fact, they were one of the best teams in the NFL this year pre-McNabb injury. They were not losing because they weren't playing well, they were losing because of incredible bad luck. Case in point: (vs. NYG) how often will Plaxico Burress fumble, the ball bounces forward 20 yards, and Tim Carter recovers in the end zone for a touchdown? (vs. TB) How often will Matt Bryant hit a 62 yard FG to win as the clock expires? If those two highly unlikely events don't happen, the Eagles are 9-5 and on top of the NFC East.
It has nothing to do with He Who Shall Not Be Named; the Eagles are a very good football team.
2006-12-15 19:34:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Dante, Reggie and Westbrook are keeping them alive after the loss of Kearse and McNabb. T.O is a retart.
2006-12-16 00:17:10 · answer #2 · answered by Jon 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think the Eagles are better off without TO. He was more trouble than he was worth and needed to go.
For more on the Eagles and the NFL, check this site out. http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/
2006-12-15 19:19:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They aren't bad, they are battling for a playoff spot. They aren't true Super Bowl contenders, but that has just as much with Donovan McNabb getting hurt as it does with TO leaving.
2006-12-15 19:00:09 · answer #4 · answered by Brandon S 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They suck with or without him
2006-12-16 13:47:11 · answer #5 · answered by bucsandducks 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eagles sucked with TO and suck without him. Mc Nabb has no good WR. He never did................... Dallas transofrmed TO.
2006-12-15 21:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by Shockwave48 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
they suck period
2006-12-15 19:00:28 · answer #7 · answered by Cincyfan0591 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋