They are so opposed to the plan that FDR built for them, perhaps they should stop feeding at the troth they hate so much, show a little civil disobedience and send them checks back to Uncle Sam. How many can I count on?
2006-12-15 15:27:56 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Remember S&L's, Remember Enron, well if Wall Street get's a hold on SS, it will make them look like small change. Some people never get tired of being duped. Do you actually believe that George Bush wants to save SS?
2006-12-16 13:33:10 · update #1
hahaha... I doubt it too... and some people seem a little confused by the premise...
I think you should be able to opt out of deals like social security and welfare... don't pay for them, but you NEVER get the service if you don't pay for it... you have to decide when your like 18 and there is no changing it after that...
2006-12-15 15:39:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
3 or 4
2006-12-15 15:30:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I was wondering what you libs would come up with next to bytch about lol. Yeah good logic experts say the way it is run now there won't be enough to pay everyone in a few years. I never did understand why the libs are so much against privatizing some of it. I mean come on all the bill asked for was 2%! Maybe it's because they are used to borrowing all the money out of it but the repo's do the same thing. If both parties left it alone it would be ok. geeez do some research before you shoot your mouth off. You are embarrassing yourself
2006-12-15 15:49:56 · answer #3 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Conservatives, the human beings that are completely to blame for the ruination of social safe practices (see Reagan) are required with the help of their concepts to refuse their social safe practices funds, and any Medicare reward they are presented, and, for sure, any unemployment reimbursement they'd nicely be presented. And, being Conservatives, they're going to settle for those funds considering each and each one them that espouse themselves to be conservatives are one hundred% liars as all of us knows. that's exactly why Conservatism is now useless. It replaced right into a lie from the start and has shown itself to be a very ineffectual and defective philosophy. so a procedures as different amenities are in touch, i'm confident they under no circumstances call the police (after all, they have their personal guns), refuse to bypass to any medical institution which could not one hundred% deepest, remove their personal trash, refuse their company's contribution to their health care, pay one hundred% of their taxes and do not worry with deductions, have served interior the military, make a contribution 10% of their income to charity, received't, in any respect, take section interior the present authorities bailouts, will retire completely on their 401K's, and private their personal organization.
2016-11-30 20:18:31 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats retarded. After being taxed for it why wouldn't you want the money back that was taken from you , especially when your money went into something you were totally against. I would understand refusing social security checks if you had an option not to pay for it from your check over the years of hard work. Otherwise its like letting the theives just take it all. Might as well get as much of the money back as possible.
2006-12-15 15:34:25 · answer #5 · answered by HOVO 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Republicans are not opposed to Social Security. We are opposed to the government doing it. The Dow Jones average has always had a greater return than Social Security over the same period. True Republicans are about results.
Not only this, but my money is taken from me without due process. If the government wants to return one cent of it, I will take it. It is my money and belongs to me.
2006-12-15 15:47:52 · answer #6 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Good idea, but every conservative I know and have asked that particular question always take the fifth, you know when you have cheated on your taxes because some other less deserving republican has more income than you do, like his wife.
Mr. and Mrs. Goodwrench is sending each of those SS checks to the homeless fund. It is after all a matter of principle! The more principle, the more interest payment one collects.
2006-12-15 15:37:31 · answer #7 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
When Bill Clinton had his surplus budget, He actually had a 60 billion dollar defecit until he gave social security an IOU for 92 billion! There is his 32 billion dollar surplus. Look it up!
2006-12-15 15:34:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
They want to privatize the social security !!!
2006-12-15 15:30:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Social Security is crap. I will only collect b/c our facist government will imprison me for tax evasion. When I get there, I will collect every dime back that I put it. Say no to big government!!!!
2006-12-15 15:30:39 · answer #10 · answered by farmhand 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋