2006-12-15 13:47:40 · 9 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
it's kinda tricky but deep.. i guess, it's about being whole as an individual before you can be a part of any relationships. it's like, loving yourself first before anyone else, because if you don't have love for yourself, you could not truly love someone else... YOU CANNOT GIVE SOMETHING THAT YOU DON'T HAVE.
2006-12-15 13:58:29 · answer #1 · answered by schinina 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me the statement could mean a few things. It could be referencing to a lesson in devotion, as to say one is not welcome if they aren't willing to give it they're all. It could mean what Wayne said, you can't give something you don't have. Still yet it could mean that no pieces or parts can exist that are not part of a whole. My opinion is that the phrase is quite intriguing.
2006-12-15 14:42:08 · answer #2 · answered by cementshroom13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everything you ask seems to revolve around the same theme, non dualism. So my opinion of that statement is nothing is separate yet nothing is unified.
2006-12-15 14:14:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a statement is a statement. ask a question.
2006-12-15 16:15:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Incompletion is Incompletion.
Imperfection is Imperfection.
Doesn't matter whether its by an inch or a yard.
2006-12-15 18:55:12 · answer #5 · answered by Saffren 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thus this mean you are not as whole as if you are not as part ? can one exist alone without the other? my oppinion i could not agree more
2006-12-15 18:43:08 · answer #6 · answered by alfonso p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can be only as whole as you are. All parts :) are whole. And we all are parts of whole mosaic. are you satisfied? justOne
2006-12-15 14:08:40 · answer #7 · answered by justOne 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds stupid to me
2006-12-15 13:49:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
*8***
2006-12-15 13:51:54 · answer #9 · answered by W. Tree 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋