English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

use cylindrical shells to find the volume of the solid that results when the region enclosed by y^2=8x and x=2 is revolved about the line x=4.

I got (64(4sqrare root 2-1)pie)/5. Is it correct?

2006-12-15 13:33:41 · 4 answers · asked by daniel n 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

4 answers

I get the same answer. I used 2*pi*integral(x*f(x)) where f(x) is sqrt(8x) and the limits are 2 to 4.

2006-12-15 13:46:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No trouble will be if you shift the whole stuff by 4 to the left so that y^2=8(x+4) and x+4=2 or y=s*sqrt(8x+32)), where s=-1 or +1, x=-2 and Y-axis is axis of rotation;
now the volume of elementary shell dv=-(2pi*x*dx) * h,
where h = sqrt(8(x+4))-(- sqrt(8(x+4)) or upper-branch minus lower-branch, -2pi*x*dx is the area of base of the elem.shell (minus to compensate negative x);
thus dv=-4pi*x*sqrt(8x+32)*dx, while –4 V=-4pi * integral{for x=-4 until –2} of x*sqrt(8x+32)*dx;
let u=sqrt(8x+32) then x=(1/8)*u^2 – 4,
dx=(1/4)*u*du {for u=0 until 4};
V=-pi*integral{for u=0 until 4}of ((1/8)*u^2 –4)*u^2*du =
= pi*[(1/8)*(1/5)*u^5 – (4/3)*u^3] = -pi*(4^5 / 40 – (4/3)*4^3) = -pi*64*(14/15) = 187.6578; while your answer = 187.2632; close but not the same ?! then check me!

2006-12-15 23:35:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is symmetry about the x axis so you can do just the upper halve and double the answer:

I looked ahead and noticed an ambiguity: is x=2 the inner boundary or the exterior? The following assumes that the shape has a hole of radius=2.

a dV = 2*pi*r*h*dr

now, h and r are functions of x:

r= 4-x , h = ksqrt(x) where k=sqrt(8)

then integrate dV from x=0 to x=2.

2006-12-15 13:46:18 · answer #3 · answered by modulo_function 7 · 0 0

The cylindrical shell technique is composed of approximating the volume lower than the exterior of revolution with techniques from a chain of concentric cylindrical shells, the position the properly of a particular shell between the values x1 and x1 + d is f(x1) and for that reason the volume contained with techniques from the shell is Pi*((x1 + d)^2)*f(x1) - Pi*((x1)^2)*f(x1 + d) = Pi*f(x1)*[(x1 + d)^2 - (x1)^2] = Pi*f(x1)*(x1 + d - x1)(x1 + d + x1) = Pi*f(x1)*(2x1 + d)*d. We uniformly slice the area over (x1, x2) into n cylindrical shells such that each and each and every shell has d = (x2 - x1)/n and sum those cylindrical slices over the period (x1, x2), then take the decrease as n will strengthen without sure (or likewise, as d techniques 0) to get the fundamental style 2*Pi*Int[x1, x2][x*f(x)] dx. on your case, we get the style 2*Pi*Int[0, a million][x^4] dx.note the similarity to the formula C = 2*Pi*r, as if we were summing infinitesimally skinny cylindrical shells of properly f(x) and radius x. there's no dy interior the cylindrical shell technique for this curve; you should apply dy in case you've been utilising the disc technique. if so, you should rewrite the function as f(y) = y^(a million/3) and use the fundamental style Pi*Int[0, a million][(y^(a million/3))^2] dy, as if we were summing infinitesimally skinny cylinders of radius f(y) and correctly dy.

2016-11-30 20:13:06 · answer #4 · answered by laranjeira 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers