If the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were fought with the same ferocity as WWII...?

Question

would both wars have been over by now?
Don't misinterpret me. Let me explain:
With both wars, we are having to be "politically correct". This is not only costing more civilian lives, but more of our soldiers, as well.
Should we just go in with all that we've got, and get it over with?

Answer 1

I guess 'shock and awe' wasn't enough for you, devastating the infrastructure of an entire country which we now own and must rebuild. The loss of civilian life isn't enough for you, would you like to use napalm again so that we could watch women and children being burned alive. Once again; there were no WMD's, Hussein hated the other Muslim sects, he wanted it all for himself, there was no connection. Colin Powell admitted that the 'facts' he gave the UN were wrong. Do you believe him now! The Pakistani's have spread Nuclear arms technology throughout the world; not the Iraqi's, not the North Koreans, not the Iranians. How many more lies until you realize you've been duped.

Answer 2

the main distinction is that we did no longer connect WWII, it joined us. on the different hand, Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, Bosnia, and so on., have been no genuine possibility to something yet our national ego. The 9/11 hijackers have been Saudis. we would desire to have actually carpet bombed Al Qaeda's practise camps in Afghanistan and despatched interior the Delta tension to end them without taking up the great u . s . a .. whilst the government injects money into the economic equipment and creates jobs, even military ones, it has a favorable result on the economic equipment. It will pay the corporate, which invests in factories and could pay workers, who purchase foodstuff and ipods and improve the buyer sector. yet producing a bomb is in basic terms 0.5 as helpful as spending the comparable quantity on a street because of the fact the bomb then blows up and destroys some thing, while the line would shop paying dividends for some destiny years. yet people are conditioned to creating sacrifices and procuring wars, yet no longer President Obama's intense-velocity rail software, even no be counted if this is extra suitable for the economic equipment. So WWII did end the melancholy, usually because of the fact the government re-prepared marketplace and rationed luxurious products with the only objective of pursuing a war in ideas. even though it additionally bigger the deficit double the quantity we've right this moment. It became a sacrifice for all people. u.s. won't in any respect have joined if we had any genuine selection.

Answer 3

You are saying we should use nuclear weapons. Fire bomb cities, so everyone in the city dies. Kill everything that moves. Everything died in WW2. People headed for the countryside, kept their head low. This happened because no one wanted to deal with Hitler effectively when he invaded Austria. Iraq in Kuwait

Hitler was a buffer against communism. Sadam was a buffer against Muslim extremist in Iran.

The military gave Bush the requirement to military occupy Iraq. Bush rejected the troop numbers, reducing the number of troops sent. The military used numbers used in previous wars,WW2, Korea and Vietnam. Bush made a political decision based on a new idea.

Since fewer troops were sent, civil war is on the horizon. There are not enough troops in Iraq to surpress a civil war. The evidence will be more US troops killed every week. The military's first number is now too small. Because Bush wanted to cheat at the game, the human cost will be higher.

A peaceful country requires no armed presence. A war torn contry requires an armed presence on every street corner.

If we pull out of Iraq, the problems we run away from will chase us home.

Do you remember when a tv crew got video of a patrol coming across dead combatants. When one soldier found a living combant hiding with the dead, he instantly killed him; armed or not. The public outcried at this killing, even when this is normal in war. Enemy soldiers hiding are killed, not taken prisoner. A enemy soldier has to ask for surrender, to be given it.

It is never a good idea to overtake another country. If the citizens of the country won't do it, let it be. The US is in Iraq to stabilize the area. The US military will be there for decades. Look at how long the US army is in Korea. They are still there.

Then again, perhaps the world should ban the sale of military equipment. Let them kill each other with sticks and stones. Another thought, stop buying arab oil. But that won't happen.

Answer 4

This war in Iraq is QUITE different than WWII for several fundamental reasons.

ONE, this isn't a world war (yet).

And TWO we weren't trying to occupy a country and "bring democracy" all the while fighting the "war on terror."

Go read all about WWII and learn about our current situation.

You can't compare the two more than loosely.

Answer 5

wow you look at iraq as a thing those are human beings over there fighting for a cause they believe in you dont know what there going threw because you dont have to worry about your family blowing up because a military truvk jus ran them over just because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time for all the good we have done over there we have done just enough bad alot of kids are homeless overthere begging people for food wow put your shoes in theres if you grew up over there all your life you probably would be against the united states

Answer 6

Sure why not? Unless of course we use a little foresight and determine if we did that we would surely be creating even more hatred towards America. That idea would certainly create more terror attacks here in the states. When will some people wake up and realize we cannot use our military strength to "win" this fiasco?

Answer 7

Yes, they would be over and won by now. The problem is the liberal media has drained the will of the people by reporting these wars as being 100% bad. Liberals don't want America to win a war under Republican leadership, and this is attributed simply to the fact that they want power over the health of this country. Its sad, but its the facts

Answer 8

You're exactly right. How many time have I been watching hoards of masked Islamic radicals marching down a street somewhere waving machine guns and chanting "death to America!". One hellfire missile right into the middle of that crowd would do wonders to calm them down.

Answer 9

Absolutely.

We fired bombed Germany and Japan, killing more lives in each attack than the A-Bombs.

Now we have the political restrictions of being politically correct, and trying avoid civillian casualties at all cost.

Answer 10

they would have lasted 6 months tops. only then you could tell who the enemy was. they didn't hide behind women and children like they do now.