No. After growing up in luxury and priviledge, you have certain responsibilties.
However, Edward VIII would probably been a bad king, so it turned out to be a win-win. Or not, since the marriage was reportedly unhappy.
2006-12-15 16:10:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sandy Lou 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
we received't spoil out the actual incontrovertible reality that Henry the 8 had created the church of england so he ought to marry and divorce at will that replaced into in 1534 now quick ahead to 1936 plenty has replaced in England for the duration of those 4 hundred years, Edward VIII ought to no longer have it his own way the straightforward reality are Wallace Simpson replaced right into a divorce and the British institution and structure on the instantaneous does no longer enable a divorce Queen on the English throne yet time has replace when you consider that then now quick ahead to 2005 the following we stumble on yet another destiny king of england,Prince Charles marrying Camilla Parker Bowles a divorce there have been hardly any objection and Charles replaced into no longer requested to provide up his rights of succession to the throne even with the actual incontrovertible reality that his spouse stands out because the subsequent Queen of england circumstances have easily replaced
2016-11-26 21:55:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would agree to be king first then pass out a law that I can marry any woman I want.
2006-12-16 19:13:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by agelikewine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have been married, never been king. Got to be better.
2006-12-15 13:12:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Choose the former and get all the latter you want.
2006-12-16 04:00:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by chickenger 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on how much I would love her.
2006-12-16 01:14:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sarah* 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
HA!! That would be a freezing cold day in Hell !
2006-12-16 00:41:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Probably not.
2006-12-15 13:07:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Clown Knows 7
·
1⤊
0⤋