2006-12-15 12:34:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not very many people did... but that sure didn't stop anything.
2006-12-15 13:10:24 · answer #1 · answered by jayne_galaxy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what do you do when a small faction wouldn't accept your rule and planned to assassinate you .............. INVITE THEM FOR TEA AND DONUTS? after more than two decades of UN and particularly us sanctions ........ he is still in power and he still managed to keep out Islamic fundamentalism ........ no small feat ....... he still got the support of his people?
does the 1 million death took into account the people that died because of those sanction? is everything peaceful after the removal of Saddam? is Iraq a BEACON OF DEMOCRACY AFTER THE INVASION? DOES THE IRAQI PEOPLE ASK FOR THIS INVASION?
is there anything wrong with the citizen of a country fighting against invader? POLITICALLY INCORRECT BUT IT GOT TO BE ASK
2006-12-15 12:55:56 · answer #2 · answered by AlfRed E nEuMaN 4 preSIDent 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gandhi was a pacifist so no. Saddam would have had Gandhi executed for being a corrupting influence by the way.
2006-12-15 12:39:28 · answer #3 · answered by Michael 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Assuming that Gandhi was as peaceful that the media tells us. Hell Ya.
2006-12-15 12:37:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ask the Kurds... ASSUMING Saddam left any alive.
2006-12-15 12:37:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
definitly ghandi was ghankis kahns brother they both plotted to rule the war together and kill all the straight people
2006-12-15 13:27:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Gandhi opposed fighting Hitler. Candi got killed. Do you see a connection?
2006-12-15 13:22:09 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No and before you ask neither would Mother Theresa.
2006-12-15 12:37:07 · answer #8 · answered by Faux News 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋