Which party is more full of blind rage and hate toward fellow Americans?

Question

1950-60's Democratic Party lead by segregationists and racists? or
2000's Democratic Party lead by leftists and gay community?

The old school Democrats had:
Democrat Governor George Wallace of Alabama proclaimed "segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."
Current Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of W Virginia was and still is a Ku Klux Klansman.
Democrats from Arkansas defied the desegregation laws of the federal government prompting Pres Eisenhower to send in the 101st Airborne division to Little Rock.

So, it's close, but I would have to lean toward the 2000's Democratic Party as more full of hate toward their fellow Americans.

Answer 1

Republicans say that Democrats love terrorists and want to destroy America. That is disgusting, untrue and full of hate. My vote is for the Republicans.

Answer 2

I agree with you but for different reasons. Hey truth seeker you dissapoint me! with all that the heads of the democratic party have done and said not counting their cronies in the media how can you say the Democratic party is less full of hate? Not that it really matters I am very dissapointed in both parties. But leaking intellegence to the New York times that helps terrorists just to maybe make Bush look bad? come on Bud that's about as close to treson as you can get. I could site more quotes by Dems but I think you have heard them all and choose to ignore them. Like club gitmo is worse then a natzi concentration camp. lol Don't get me wrong I am more dissapointed in the repo's then the libs the Repo's had the majority for a long time and chose to just be quiet and try and get along. Idiots With the Dems or liberals I know where they stand they can't stand anyone (right now it's Bush) that gets in their way of power and will use any means to re-gain their power. Well America has chosen to buy into their hate theme as so many on here have jumped on the band wagon. So be it...now show me something positive Dems can you?

Answer 3

Bush, representing the Republican Party, thinks that the Americans have sided with the terrorists because they gave the win to the Democrats in the midterm election of 2006.

This single behavior by Bush, convincingly proves which party is paranoid about the Americans.

Answer 4

You mention some old school Democratic southerners, yet it is today's Republican southerners who are filled with impotent rage toward those who actually FOUNDED the country in the Northeast.

Remember how Bush has always made a point of mentioning Kerry's hailing from "Mass-a-chuuus-seetts" to his conservative base? When Bush says it in his bastardized combination of blueblood Ivy leaguer and Texas drawl, it has about 37 syllables and is made out to be something Kerry should be morbidly ashamed of.

Never mind that the patriots of Massachusetts and other New England states virtually founded the country single-handedly.

Also, Massachusetts gets back about $0.75 for every dollar it gives to the Federal government in taxes. Mississippi and Alabama, to name just two southern states, get about $1.75 back for every dollar they pay.

In general, Massachusetts residents are vastly more economically productive than southerners and all they get in return is attacks from these lazy hate-filled rednecks.

Answer 5

Byrd is, of course, NOT currently a member of the Klan. When you state a "fact" like that, you don't really make yourself look too smart.

Yep, there were vestiges of the civil war era Democrats well into the middle part of last century. It's common knowledge that Abraham Lincoln's Republican party has pretty much become the contemporary Democratic party. When Lyndon Johnson signed the civil rights bill into law, he noted to an aid that "we have lost the south." And indeed we had, for all of those racist motherf*ckers are Republicans now.

Tell me I'm wrong. Tell me the south isn't solid, solid red.

I've got rage, my friend, but it isn't blind.

Which party is more full of ignorant, research-a-phobic bigots?

Answer 6

All bs aside, it doesn't really come down to which party is the worst. there are good and bad members of both major political parties. politicians, in general, have sold out to the highest bidders. i don't really think any politician really hates america or americans. it is a matter of lining their own pockets at the expense of the american public.

Answer 7

this question does no longer require an clever rebuttal. I shall attempt to "answer" it by using crafting one besides: confident, the Democratic occasion of the previous replaced into the occasion of segregationists and racists, extremely contained in the South (for this reason the term "Dixiecrats"). The history of political events contained in the U.S. is an prolonged, convoluted and exciting one. i might advise which you examine up on it, because it incredibly is an exciting component to our history, yet I doubt you will. in actuality, I doubt you will examine previous the 1st few sentences of this, as curiously you're greater interested in smearing and contact-calling than incredibly discourse. yet besides, in a nutshell, the Democratic occasion has had a incredibly good professional-slavery, anti-Civil rights undertone until the 30's, whilst Roosevelt presented the hot Deal, and the occasion grew to become increasingly greater "liberal." This alienated the Dixiecrats, who deserted the occasion. It replaced right into a shameful previous, yet situations replaced, and so has the tone of the Democratic. (As an aside, the Republican occasion replaced into based contained in the mid-nineteenth century with a good abolitionist platform. the 1st Republican presidential candidate replaced into Abraham Lincoln). i would be unable to incredibly make logical experience of your subsequent concept, that "leftist and gay community (sic)" are finally greater "crammed with hatred and blind rage in direction of fellow human beings" than segregationists who lynched, released attack canines on and became hearth hoses on African-human beings and civil rights demonstrators. Please grant examples wherein gay rights activists or liberals have strung up, terrorized or bodily intimidated others?

Answer 8

Oh, boy are you gonna get a roasting for this one! But you are correct about Byrd - let's see the apologists take on this one.

Don't forget that Democrats, who were so "upset" over the Foley scandal, re-elected Gerry Studds. Gerry Studds (D, MA) went a LOT further than some lewd emails - Studds got busted for having sex with an underage page and STILL got re-elected! Where was their outrage then? And, as if that wasn't bad enough on it's own, when Studds died, he was pretty much hailed in the MSM for being "the first openly gay Congressman". Well, that's true....but he only "came out" because he got caught having sex with the underage (male) page. F*ing hypocrites.

Answer 9

The 2000's like and support the terrorists and blame America for getting blown up. I HELLBENT would say you are correct in picking them by a slim margin. The other group sucks too.

Answer 10

The Consumer Party.
If you want Change, keep it in your pocket. The crooked corporations buy the crooked politicians with the money and time you give them.
Buy less, buy local, buy only what you need.