I would cancel, LTD company immunity to liability for debts. Anyone found guilty of crime would have there assets frozen immediately, so called underage crime would be would be replaced by parental punishment, anyone in public service would be liable for their for actions as per private sector companies, they would also only recieve the same benefits as any other worker regarding pensions and compensation, locally elected councillers would only recieve average national wages plus accountable expenses and be fully accountable for their decisions, immigration would only be allowed to suitably qualified applicants thereby excluding the economic applications, any applicants found to be felons prior to or within 5 years of their applications will be permanently removed and or barred from entry to the U.K., Reinstatement of the married person allowances on tax rebates, reinstatement of the pensionable age entitlement, relinquishment of politicians above normal citizen status, to start with
2006-12-15 10:30:49 · 12 answers · asked by wisernow 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes I'd vote for you.
2006-12-15 10:34:02 · answer #1 · answered by selchiequeen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I like some of the policies enough I'd have to wait and here more first! I would be prepared to give you a fair hearing but you dont get the vote yet!
I'd want to know first how you think Parents can control children when society screams abuse and childrens rights every time you even think of punishing one!
I'd also need to know what you mean by Suitably Qualified Immigrants, who would decide those qualifications!
There are lots of Important issues not even mentioned!
2006-12-15 10:53:44 · answer #2 · answered by willowGSD 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
may have to bend it on parental issues as some kids are way beyond control ( is this the parents fault in first place? maybe) I would also shot all neds at birth and segregate drug addicts on to a inaccessible island and let them go cold turkey. As fo politicians/councillors - NO expenses pay it yourself stingey bgrs
No execution btw bit frieked by that would even have sadam rot in jail forever than hear he has to be hung. Strange as I thought I would be 100% behind death penalty. But you could put her in a frotty housing estate instead of all those palaces
Yes I would give you my vote on those issues
2006-12-15 10:35:20 · answer #3 · answered by mandg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any one that suggest we kill the Queen should be shot! your lucky we got rid of the Death penalty because for your comment i would personaly Pull the tirgger.
im interested to know how you feel about the Monarchy? its an ensential part of British way of life.
2006-12-17 07:30:05 · answer #4 · answered by djgunn16 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep got my vote,then i put you in the tower of london for treason i would give you a fair trial, then have you beheaded,so dont worry i would do it to all prime ministers, but england would only be for the english,the world big enought for all the scum to go else where
2006-12-15 23:08:47 · answer #5 · answered by archaeologia 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't vote for you because like all politicians you wouldn't follow up on your policies and f@*k the country over like every other politican has.
2006-12-15 10:43:20 · answer #6 · answered by GayAtheist 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Add to that detention in solitary for cold turkey for criminals found to be heroin users.
2006-12-15 23:04:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
You would rule the united kingdom like every other monarch.
2006-12-17 00:59:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I will vote for you if you improve the weather.
2006-12-15 10:39:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have my vote.
2006-12-15 10:33:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋