Since our bodies as a law of nature are meant to be with the opposite sex and since no science points to any sort of natural chemical imbalance or other disorder it must be a choice.
The argument otherwise would be like the argument that bestiality in not a choice, and those people are born that way.
And I'm not trying to belittle or insult or make fun. It is just a simple question.
2006-12-15 10:06:27 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
It is not a chemical imbalance, it is genetics and biology.
2006-12-15 10:11:52 · answer #1 · answered by χριστοφορος ▽ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You don't truly understand sexuality. Sexuality occurs on a spectrum. Not everyone is on one side or the other everyone falls someplace in between completely straight and completely gay.
Laws of Nature you claim make homosexuality wrong. If that is so then why is homosexuality seen in many animal species? Would they be going against nature? Probably not since animals can not change their nature.
Using beasiality as an example of why homosexuality is a choice is completely ignorant. In nature species interbreed with their own species. They can not choose to mate with other species. It's like would a cow mate with a horse. Not likely. A human can not be born to mate with animals, only other humans.
As far as a chemical imbalance is concerned, it is possible that if there is a chemical imbalance it occured in the womb. There is scientific evidence that the brains of gay men differ from straight men. This can be used to prove that homosexuality is caused by something prenatal as how can you choose to change the physical make up of your brain?
The doctrines of religion teach that homosexuality is wrong. However, what does the bible really say? "If a man leaves his natural affection for a woman to lay with another man it is a sin" However, if you never had a natural affection for the opposite sex, how could you leave it? When there were few people on earth homosexuals were outcast because they were not procreating and making more people for their nation. Could it be that homosexuality is nature's population control?
2006-12-15 10:19:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well considering you have dismissed all science as having no significance or answers you accept, answering you would be a moot point. You've already made up your mind. People like you are the ones that still believe things like epilepsy are caused by demon possession. Simply because science has not been able to produce a definitive answer yet does not mean that they won't. The gene that causes left-handedness hasn't been found either so should you beat your children and attempt to force them to write with the "correct" hand?
For someone that is not trying to belittle, insult, or make fun of others, you do a very good job of being condescending and jumping to conclusions.
2006-12-15 10:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Okay it could be a chemical imbalance in your head, but I (this will totaly be science-y) learned in my Biology class about this guy and he created Malthus Law. This means nature will keep itself in check. Example: Muscles (the sea food) produce millions of eggs and let them free into the ocean, but only thousands live. This is because the eggs are not fertilized, are eaten, or something else happens to them.
So look at it as being gay is nature saying "wo, there are to many of you, lets cut this population down a bit". So your even more special. This is the way I look at it.
2006-12-15 14:46:26 · answer #4 · answered by darkon332 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're ignoring other animals in nature who also exhibit homosexual behavior. There are theories about community-adaptive benefits to homosexuality.
Also, some science DOES point to natal-hormone levels and genetic influence. The law of nature you cite might not be a law so much as a "guide" not always meant to be followed.
2006-12-15 18:57:24 · answer #5 · answered by Atropis 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why does anything you don't agree with an imbalance? And equating bestiality to homosexuality IS an insult AND belittling.
2006-12-15 10:10:48 · answer #6 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I honestly don't know. I've heard females that said they won't be with a man because men just hurt them...and I've heard some say they will only be with women because only a woman knows what a woman likes. I personally believe a woman should be with a man. Sometimes things don't turn out the way we hope, but I wouldn't change my preference. But, I have walked only in my footsteps.......no one else's, so it's not for me to judge or criticize.
2006-12-15 10:14:34 · answer #7 · answered by Lovinlife 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i comprehend homosexuals who have not had any 'tragic events' of their existence, and the purely right element they'd choose in this international would to be an intruder... Homosexuals are gay because theres something contained in the mind that triggers points of interest, and this area of their mind isn't like heterosexuals. Allot of homosexuals somewhat choose they weren't gay, so as that they could slot in extra, yet theres in reality no longer something they could be able to do about it yet change into asexual and in no way love of their existence. Its decision depressing to comprehend that you the position born with a forbidden choose, yet persons can carry out their needs and spoil out with it. IDK if technology got here upon out precisely whats incorrect with a homosexuals mind, yet their mind is oviously different then a hetrosexuals at the same time as it contains points of interest, because of this they're regarded at as outcasts and society treats them like ****. contained in the destiny, at the same time as human beings change into extra muture and comprehend each and each and every of the information of existence, they'll comprehend how incorrect it replaced into of them to handle homosexuals how they did... yet untill then... society will purely keep obeying something all people wrote in a e book a ka-jillion years in the past... this international is heavily tousled.
2016-11-26 21:41:35 · answer #8 · answered by ayoub 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you do some research I believe you will find that homosexual behavior is present in animals occasionally too. It is not a human only phenomena.
It is not a choice. It is biology.
And there is nothing wrong with homosexuality.
2006-12-15 10:09:52 · answer #9 · answered by krinkn 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is not things, but opinions about things that have absolutely no existence, which have so deranged mankind!
from Nietzsche's Daybreak, s. 563, R.J. Hollingdale transl
2006-12-15 10:09:04 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋