What would the generals say, what would happen during PMS and would it be worse or better that male testosteron.
2006-12-15 09:54:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Isn't a better question, "do you think someone who is honest, intelligent and the country supports should be president?" If the person happens to be a female, great. Black, brown, blue, green, with antennae from mars - great. Geez, can't we elect someone qualified instead of some oil guy who studies a list of 5 soundbites in order to give answers to the country's problems?
2006-12-15 10:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by commonsense 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Try and look at it from a different perspective. I know many men that just can't keep it in their pants, whether they are married or not. I know many that can and do. I know a lot of women who suffer from emotional swings during PMS. I also know many who do not. Any woman who suffers debilitating PMS symptoms and lets them take control of her life isn't going to be running for President in the first place. The whole picture of a woman with her finger on the button while PMSing in emotional turmoil is stupid claptrap and is about as realistic as picturing a male President surfing porn on the net while the launch codes are being confirmed. Please.
2006-12-15 10:19:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think a woman should be in office. Women generally don't have their minds on one certain thing. Usually that is men. But women also, according to studies done, tend to be smarter and more clever.( no offense guys...) You know, men could never handle going through PMS and such. They would be crying like it was the end of the world... Besides, women and men are still equal in a general sense and we all have the ability to run a country if you understand the basics... Especially this country.
2006-12-15 09:57:53 · answer #3 · answered by Aleah Marie LL 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Is not the question should be or shouldn't.The question is: are we ready for a female in the White House.Besides,is the whole world ready for a female in l600 Pennsylvania Av.Very complex answers.By the moment according to the country direction,no.The next president is going to have the spirit,and leadership to turn around the direction and fix the mistakes of this Administration.
2006-12-15 10:04:50 · answer #4 · answered by Mario Vinny D 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have no problem with a woman being President. I don't foresee any real difference from men.
Of course I would never support Hillary Clinton, she's just crazy left. I thought Clinton was bad, I can't imagine if she was President.
I must mention that I am coming from a military perspective. We, generally, don't like Clinton.
2006-12-15 09:57:38 · answer #5 · answered by Jon M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
not all women get PMS you ignorant F U C K, infact, not all women get periods. If you take the depo shot (which is brith control) you can stop having periods, which means.....no PMS.
They'd be more organized and rational I bet.
Leave the generals out of this. There are tons of female officers in the military....again, ignorance!
...they wouldn't be as uneducated as some of the idiots here!
2006-12-15 09:57:03 · answer #6 · answered by ur a Dee Dee Dee 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
A woman is just as capable of doing the job as a man! In the case of Bush, is there a woman that could do a worse job?
2006-12-15 09:58:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey, why not?
But they have to wait until 2016, Barack Obama will be President from '08-'16. If he doesn't run, Clinton. If she doesn't run, I might be thinking Giuliani.
2006-12-15 09:58:29 · answer #8 · answered by myaspan 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
there is no reason why a woman shouldn't be. And PMS has nothing to do with it.
2006-12-15 10:02:38 · answer #9 · answered by carmen a 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. but my Mother has passed on. so theres noone that would fit the shoe for that job I can think of. sorry.
2006-12-15 10:01:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋