Jamey B a good boy and look up the word, sarcasm. Then look for the word paranoid and see your picture.
Anyway, Israel will nuke the Iranians soon, followed by the US nuking Morth Korea, the Indians and Pakistanis nuking each other, the Chinese nuking anything left that moves, and that's all she wrote.
2006-12-15 09:56:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Firstly you have not won the war in Iraq.. you are losing it by your country's own admission.
Secondly if you consider the killing of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians winning a war then I really find your statement to be very disturbing...
Thirdly the US needs to stop meddling in other countries' affairs.. you only ever do it if there is something in it for your country..
Where was the USA when Rwanda needed you? Nearly 1 million people died, yet your country alongside most of the West stood back and did nothing. Where is the good ole USA now during the massacres which are going on in Northern Uganda or Sudan...???
People would feel more affinity towards your country if it the USA did not pick and choose its war based upon it ability to acquire oil.
Iran and North Korea in particular will not stand back and allow your country to start wars unilaterally.. and if the US continue in this vein then they will almost certainly create the war to end all wars...!!
Jamie B above - would have to agree with your statement!!
2006-12-15 09:40:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Please provide evidence that we won the war. If we did win, why are we still there and why are more and more of our troops being killed everyday?
How can you even suggest that we start another war? We have financed the Iraq war on our children's children's future. How much more should we spend? How many more lives do you want to sacrifice because they don't have a "democracy" like ours. Did it ever occur to you that they might not want our democracy?
As for WMDs. We have them. Why do we insist on making everyone disarm except us? Is that reasonable? Should we attack because a country claims to have WMDs? Do we need to think everyone is out to get us? Maybe they are because of how we act on the world scene. What if we tried a peaceful negoitiation with these countries, not making demands but actually listening and negotiating. Wouldn't a peaceful resolution make more sense? Maybe we could gain the respect and trust of these nations who currently hate us.
2006-12-15 09:41:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
..... LOL ..... ur sucking up for bush arent ya.. Ur one unique bush lover that admits it .. We won teh war in iraq? are u kidding me? We didnt take control of it yet .. troops are still dying (hundreds a month) and its a complete chaos and you clal that a victory .. At least saddam was able to maintaine a country without ahaving ciilians boming each other!!!! I think Bush will declare his next war on MEXICO .. lol
Nope sorry we are no capable of invading iran .... if that war hapenes it woill be a messy blood spill .. iraq was nothing if u compare it to iransmilitary.... iraq was weak .. and devastated when we attacked .... dont forget they were seized and controlled for a good ten years after the first gulf war. If bush does invade iran .. then this country will build a highway to hell.
Wack away bush lover... ur one of a kind.
2006-12-15 09:39:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Precisely which war do you think you are winning?????
You are losing the war in Iraq and if you choose to invade either Iran, Syria or North Korea, then the USA would be wiped off the face of the earth... I am not advocating this but merely stating a fact. North Korea has nuclear capabilities and Iran and Syria are developing theirs... they will not stand back and be invaded!
The policies of the USA will eventually lead to the obliteration of this world.. I have no doubt about that! But people like yourself almost certainly give credence to the term "uneducated"
2006-12-15 09:49:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
First the Iraq conflict isn't a conflict, as Vietnam and Korea weren't technically wars. we are scuffling with and scarcity of life yet no statement of conflict became issued by making use of the Congress. 2d, Bush did no longer declare the conflict became over, he declared that substantial wrestle operations have been over. He intently worded the word so this argument ought to no longer be used against him. additionally he posed with the challenge effectual banner at the back of him to make it look extra useful, nonetheless it became sparkling that we'd be in Iraq for it slow. those days the Bush White abode gave blame for the challenge finished banner to the Captain of the deliver and wiped their arms sparkling of it. All of that suggested, I on no account theory this became a physically powerful theory and that i think of a hundred and fifty,000 troops ought to nonetheless be considered substantial operations, yet it relatively is in simple terms me. the project in Iraq is going back hundreds of years and became made worse whilst the British in all of their understanding desperate to create the country with ridiculous barriers. we've 3 factions that have been scuffling with for years and with very stupid reasons and no person government that we deploy will win out. extra artwork desires to be executed to tutor that the Iraqis are working independently from the U. S. command in Iraq and extra useful circumstances would desire to be accessible for on a daily basis life. the U. S. ought to spend extra time and funds making specific the electrical powered energy is on, anybody is working and going to college and shelter, then something will artwork itself out. suitable now too many human beings have too lots time and not adequate desire and this breeds hate and the scuffling with.
2016-10-15 00:42:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am sorry to inform you my dear, the US has not won the war in Iraq, and is on the verge of losing. I don't agree with one of the other fellows (who called you a bimbo and I will report him for that), that 9/11 was done by your own Government, but the Iraqis had nothing to do with that. You see the problem was that when they toppled So-Damn-Insane's despotic government, they created a power vacuum and didn't have a viable system to replace it. The neighbouring countries like Syria and Jordan were doing nothing to stop the free flow of insurgents from crossing back and forth and causing havoc with the sole purpose of attempting to start a civil war. Furthermore, the country, which is split 60% Shiites and 40% Sunnis, elected a Government that was biased towards the Shiites, who were discriminated against by the Sunni backed Baathist party is causing further irritation to the populace. And that leaves the US right in the middle, without adequate forces to deal with the problem thanks to Donald Rumsfeld who refused to put more boots on the ground to alleviate this problem. No, this is a formula for disaster, and I personally feel very sorry for the Military people who are being killed at very high rates everyday because their leaders can't get their collective heads out of their rear-ends and either "Fish or Cut Bait". Sound like Vietnam to you? As far as attacking Iran goes, if they follow the same formula as they did with Iraq, the US will be in very deep doo-doo, and in my opinion, it has been Iran all along that has been the problem, and the US wasted their time going after Iraq, as it was a tempest in a tea-pot. No doubt that So-Damn-Insane's regime needed toppling, but remember that in the First Desert Storm conflict, Gen. Schwarzkopf wanted to continue onto Bagdhad to finish off So-Damn-Insane's regime, and George Bush Sr, said no, and after telling the Shiites to rise up and we will help you, turned and ran and left them to be slaughtered by Hussein's forces. Schwarzkopf was removed from power because he argued against that decision, and he was one of the best Military Generals to have come along in a long time. To bad he was ham-stringed by a weak, lily-livered government.
Finally, trying to bring Democracy to a people who aren't ready for such a thing is futile, and one of the Russian Cold war authors said that a people get the Government that they deserve, so when the Iranians are ready for Democracy, they will ask for it and rise up and take power themselves. Let's face it people, this is all about Oil, and the US need for it so that all the fat Mom's and Dad's can continue to drive their fat kids to and from school and the Mall and Mickey Dees in their big fat SUVs.
2006-12-15 10:05:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Crowfeather 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Victory!!!! When did this happen? We still have the same number of troops and Bush wants more.This is not what I call a win. That is his mentality
2006-12-15 09:41:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by bettys 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
No way this would get everyone else more pissed at us than they were before. It could cause other nations to get involved and then we might not win and have a huge war.
2006-12-15 09:36:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stc Gaolkeeper 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
ask the wives of the dead soilders if the war has been won.
tell their children that their fathers died in a war that was a lie - but the war has been won
2006-12-16 00:39:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋