2006-12-15 09:08:28 · 6 answers · asked by nitenurse 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
For murder... Isn,t it about time. How long are we going to let the criminals rule. BRING it BACK!!
2006-12-15 09:10:26 · update #1
Eastcoast - like the way you think. If we had to keep them alive yours is how we should be doing it. But they dont they have an easy life once inside. And it would be some kind of deterrant if they died the way there victims die that would be good. i.e. if they strangled someone they should die by strangulation. if they stabbed someone they should be stabbed... I have NO SYMPATHY for scum..
2006-12-15 09:50:30 · update #2
Absoulutly yes.
This country has gone to the dog in a big way. An eye for an eye is how it should be. Then people might think twice before carring knives and acting like tw*ts with them.
Is "east coast" stupid. He's say no to capital punishment, But thinks we should make them do work at gun point if nessesery. What's the point of holding a gun to them if you dont beleve in capital punishment. They know your not goin to shot. Think about it fellla.
2006-12-15 09:36:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
sure, easily for homicide. perchance for rape, yet no longer statutory rape the position the newborn is of a similar opinion, and perchance newborn molestation? the significant ingredient isn't no matter if someone advantages the inability of life sentence for killing someone. the biggest ingredient is the accuracy/high quality of the sentencing? everybody keep in innovations why capital punishment became abolished, it wasn't because it became barbaric! it is a sophisticated concern.
2016-10-18 08:31:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
theres overwhelming evidence that its not a deterrent.
when you meet whatever maker you meet, do you want to be able to say that you put someone to death without the ability to say they did the crime because you werent present when it happened?
why arent we putting these people away for life and forcing them to pay their own way. FORCING them, at gunpoint if necessary, to contribute something to society. make blankets for the homeless. cook food for poor people. build the next highway for commuters.
instead we put them to death guaranteeing that they never give anything back to society.
2006-12-15 09:45:27 · answer #3 · answered by eastcoastrockerdude 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, society has a right to protect itself.
2006-12-15 09:40:14 · answer #4 · answered by StormyC 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes i agree, totally, and the perverts, i hate them
2006-12-15 09:34:53 · answer #5 · answered by button moon 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
.... reform
2006-12-15 09:36:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋