I recently heard a pretty awesome rumour. It supposedly comes directly from someone who used to work for Cruise. The rumour is that Tom Cruise is gay, but Scientology's leaders don't want for their most visible member to be gay, so they paid Katie Holmes a great sum of money to marry Tom Cruise and have his child.
2006-12-15 07:54:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joy M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't like Scientiology at all. I don't even understand why it exists. To me, religion and science shouldn't mix. Tom Cruise is just simply nuts and crazy. Katie Holmes seems all right, but I feel sorry for her that she's being brainwashed with this whole Scientology ideology.
2006-12-15 08:15:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by 3lixir 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah the whole scientology thing seems kinda strange. Tom Cruise still seems kinda psycho even though he has calmed down a little. Katie Holmes just doesn't look happy.
2006-12-15 07:53:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Amanda D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine that strategically, it replaced into an excellent idea for Katie to bypass to NYC and record in that state because they're believed to be extra in all possibility to award custody to the mummy. i'm no longer particular about the cult, even with the undeniable fact that. If it ought to nicely be shown that human beings were following her, it may help human beings type beliefs about scientology being cult-like. this can for sure, help her make her case adversarial to Tom. If Suri needs to flee the international of scientology, i wish she is able. In my uncomplicated opinion, both her and Katie seem a lot happier in cutting-edge action picture star images. it truly is continually effective to be certain a mom & daughter smiling in this manner of painstaking complicated time.
2016-11-26 21:29:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think katie seems genuine, and certainly a little bit star-struck, if you ask me. she seems to be walking around with a "wow, i can't believe i'm married to tom cruise..." look on her face. as far as tom goes, i think all that crap he did last year with oprah, matt lauer, brooke sheilds, etc, i think he is losing it. he's never acted this way before, it's so odd! and by the way, he doesn't look very good these days, a little pudgy! i think all scientologists are a little bit strange, but i don't know any of them personally, so i shouldn't judge. as for their daughter, Suri, she is absolutely darling and she looks just like her dad. Holy cow! Too bad she has to be in the middle of all this chaos.
2006-12-15 08:05:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by kayzee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think anyone who cares about celebrities and their lives needs to get their own life. There just people that can lie really well (acting) and have a lot of money. I can't wait until people put their time and energy into more important things rather than the life of a celebrity.
2006-12-15 07:54:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Desiree D 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think they have to work hard to protect their personal life. It is not easy living under a microscope.
One of the biggest drawbacks of being a star, is that you don't have any privacy. It would be difficult to be in their position. I don't follow the stories in the paper or on TV, because I really don't care.
Hey, you wanna talk about a movie they have been in, or a TV show you like, then let's talk, but let them alone, don't you have anything better to do ?
2006-12-15 07:52:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that it's publicity. But in a way, Katie seems to be brainwashed or something to that effect.
2006-12-15 07:59:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by angeldiva 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Tom married Katie b/c he got her pregnant. If you look at the dates, they announced their engagment and nine months later, here comes Suri.
2006-12-15 07:53:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by retooser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see what the big deal is about either one of them. Let's move on. I'm tired of seeing them all lovey dovey on TV everytime I change a channel. What's their business is exactly that THEIR BUSINESS.
2006-12-15 07:55:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jaysangl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋