Do you think the governments of the world would ever stoop to that?
2006-12-15 06:36:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
what killing everyone who can spread it?
no its not worth it.
too violent, too barbarian.
not fair to the kids born with it or those who have another 10-20 years to live with the right meds.
2006-12-15 09:39:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You go "quatrapiller". I was wondering when someone would see what was being asked.
Oh, and the answerer below you, get an education yourself and you'll know that there are more straight people in 3rd world countries with HIV/AIDS, than all the gay people in the world put together.
Anyway, no I don't think that any governments would stoop to that, because in some cases it would be tantamount to genocide. And there are strict international laws prohibiting those actions.
And besides, have you thought of what health problems we would have due to that many dead bodies?
It's like any other disease, you have to stop the spread first and then treat the infected afterwards. Education is the ONLY way to stop it.
Polio and smallpox were epidemics at one time with no end in sight, but given time and treatment, they were completely wiped out in this country. Change takes time, not radical actions.
2006-12-15 06:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by Goyo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cannot answer the second question about government stooping without an answer to your first. I'm afraid I don't know the ONE way that you have in mind.
2006-12-15 06:40:33 · answer #3 · answered by yaadooman 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Practice monogamy. Virtually wipe out AIDS in one generation. Yes, there would still be some cases due to tainted blood transfusions and needle sharing among intravenous drug users, but the EPIDEMIC part would essentially end.
2006-12-15 06:42:01 · answer #4 · answered by Captain Obvious! 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your assumption is faulty. We do not yet know how to eliminate it. Smallpox has been totally eliminated - except in various govt labs.
To answer your question, in general, no. I certainly hope you are not advocating the Final Solution.
2006-12-15 06:47:04 · answer #5 · answered by bob h 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Government endorsed execution of all disease spreaders is not the answer.
Proper education is.
2006-12-15 06:39:23 · answer #6 · answered by quatrapiller 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Apparently YOU'RE the only one who knows....lol.
And by the way buddy, "Safe sex is in the palm of your hand."
That's the only way, safe sex.
2006-12-15 06:46:34 · answer #7 · answered by jirstan2 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would be unthinkable to most people.
2006-12-15 07:02:13 · answer #8 · answered by Sway 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, not death. Not that extreme. Isolation though... I wouldn't put it past them.
2006-12-15 06:44:04 · answer #9 · answered by mellybee4321 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not sure what you are referring to
2006-12-15 06:38:59 · answer #10 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋