It is all a grand Delusion after all....
2006-12-17 12:35:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by surfnsfree 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
news flash. hangings went out of style a while ago. just thought you should know. and i've gotten to the point where i don't like the president or the choices he's making but really, that's all we've got and america looks pretty idiotic for talking so much sh*t on the man they choose to lead them. all i can say now is young people of the world, you are the future, get off your a**es and vote. stop being passive little b*tches complaining about things you could be changing. it's your country. do something about it and stop whining.
2006-12-15 05:16:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Decoy 2.0 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last hanging we had was in Washington State, in 1996.
His name was Billy Bailey, a man who sodomized and murdered two little boys.
He asked to be hanged instead of receiving lethal injection.
And I find the term "successfully kills" rather dramatic, but interesting, nonetheless. Is that as opposed to unsuccessfully killing them, as in, they are still alive?
2006-12-15 05:19:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did we throw a parade for Saddam after he took over Kuwait. I must have missed it.
2006-12-15 05:11:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Who are you referring to? Hang? I am assuming that you are from a different country that the USA, because I am pretty sure that the law no longer hangs anyone here. Details please?
2006-12-15 05:11:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by catywhumpass 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe a mercenary plutocratic predatory few both terrorize the many and offer protection in exchange for gold in a global shakedown of epic proportions that some call a war on terror. Maybe the goal of a war on terror is not to end terror, or to create security necessary for a lasting peace. Maybe the goal of a war on terror is to spread terror in war. Maybe by spreading terror in war, a mercenary plutocratic predatory few create greater demand in the global market place for the products and services of a beast of a military industrial complex. Maybe use of terror to create greater demand in the global market place for the products and services of a beast of a military industrial complex; generates greater profits from the sale and manufacture of these products and services; and further concentrates the wealth of the global culture into the hands of a mercenary plutocratic predatory few. Maybe use of terror in an effort to create greater demand for and generate greater profits from the manufacture and sale of the products and services of a beast of a military industrial complex is a form of extortion. Maybe a mercenary plutocratic predatory few are extortionists that conspire to use terror to coerce the many into giving the few gold in exchange for protection offered by the manufacture and sale of products and services of a beast of a military industrial complex. If the mass media that the many rely upon for news and entertainment, and officials that the many rely upon for representation in government are owned and operated by a mercenary plutocratic predatory few that seeks to create greater demand for and generate greater profits from the manufacture and sale of products and services of a beast of a military industrial complex, then fraudulent prewar intelligence could be transmitted by a mercenary plutocratic predatory few from the mouths of corrupt government officials through news made available by mass media to ears of the many as a means to an end of generating public support for a war on terror. Maybe transmission of fraudulent prewar intelligence by government officials as a means to an end of generating public support for a war on terror is a form of treason. Maybe a government corrupted by commerce to the point of being owned and operated by a mercenary plutocratic predatory few would be unable and or unwilling to investigate, and would instead rally around the flag.
2006-12-15 05:22:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by H.I. of the H.I. 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why does your mind put these things together?
If I were you, I'd be more concerned with that.
2006-12-15 05:09:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋