I asked our City Code Enforcement Officer. He says that, (in my city) in lay men's terms, that you would not be violating anything because (1) the everyday prudent person would not be able to see your message or illustration (2) it falls under the "freedom of speech" issue and you are not endangering anyone except pilots who might laugh themselves to death (3) you have an expectation of privacy in your own backyard (4) the message could only be seen from the air, and the scope of the tax assessors/GPS mapping people job does not include handling things that may be considered offensive to a handful of pilots.
And since I asked him this question, Chuck is gonna be flying over my house all the time now. I think I'll plant him a set of boobies!
2006-12-15 04:53:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by ihave5katz 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would think you wouldn't as there are some horrendous material on the web. On the other hand there may be a particular local law protecting your community from people who may fly over. This would depend on the community you are living. Even Google has aerial views from its website so you do need your local assayers to do this. The government also uses sophisticated aerial imaging. Who knows what falls under the Homeland Bureau. They kind of make things up as they go along to fit an occasion. Now if you were to get the attention of a local news crew who has a helicopter that. should get you some notoriety.
2006-12-15 04:49:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it extremely is not very properly to flow the border illegally. it extremely is not ok for illegals to act and dedicate those acts of violence. rules on the books , at Federal point supplies regulation enforcement the authority to arrest ILLEGALS, era, yet ............the federal government ties the palms of the comparable human beings , the regulation says can and could enforce the regulation. it extremely is not approximately racism, it extremely is approximately Obama and the left being elected, votes.. After wards, comparable as after the final elections in 2006 while they took maximum human beings in Congress and different seats, they bypass returned to corporation as popular. I, myself stay in a border State, and that i assure, it extremely is even worse than the strategies can think of. i'm hoping all States following Arizona's regulation and do the comparable component. sufficient is sufficient. A terrorist is a terrorist, take care of them each and all the comparable. Sneaking throughout a border in some international locations, is death if caught. Open carry , could be a stable regulation in Arizona. it extremely is a real shame that it extremely is all approximately votes , not approximately risk-free practices of the yankee human beings.
2016-12-30 11:43:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not at all, it's your property, If anything did come of it, you could blame it on mere coincidence. The worst that could possibly happen is they block your property out of the aerial views.
2006-12-15 04:43:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by No-Dogg 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think this falls under the category of "FREE SPEECH"! After all, it won't be on TV and I don't know of any law against this. Before I read the question, I was going to say, "Everything that is fun is against the law or taxed".
2006-12-15 04:49:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michelle R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You better believe it. Your standing in the community would be negatively affected too. Why would you want to do such a negative awful thing to your neighbors, if you want to spell something out, do it with a positive message that lifts peoples spirits.
2006-12-15 04:45:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by mimi 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
What a fantastic idea,I would pay to see the face of the tax man as he see,s your hard work ,I don't think that you would be breaking any law,s by doing so,could you take a photo from an upstairs,s window for us to see your handy work?
2006-12-15 04:48:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bella 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
You have forgotten one important factor, Who else will view this "obscene" message of your! So I would be careful, your bound to "violate" someones rights and privileges. Merry Christmas.
2006-12-15 04:44:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by peaches 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Shut up, The Naughty Scotsman.
2006-12-15 04:40:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by King William I 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well,I don't really think there is anything wrong with that,you might get on the news though,lol.
2006-12-15 04:41:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by B-jammin 2
·
1⤊
0⤋