i hope not
2006-12-15 04:33:48 · 29 answers · asked by j-man 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
NO!
2006-12-15 04:35:41 · answer #1 · answered by FUBAR 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way! And espescially now that we know that Aaron Rogers is vunerable to injury the Packers will want to keep farve as long as possible. Which is probably 2 more years. And not only that but Farve has still got a cannon for a arm and still knows how to win games. Plus he fills up seats at home games. The public loves him more then the team right now.
2006-12-15 04:43:51 · answer #2 · answered by Odes 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Brett Favre started his career with the Falcons straight out of college. He was traded to the Packers after his first year and has been there ever since. For the organization to even think about trading him would be insane. The man has created the Packers and has been their backbone for 15 years. He became a Packer and will retire a Packer.
2006-12-15 04:55:20 · answer #3 · answered by b_dawg1219 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. First of all, I think Brett would retire before playing for another team and second, the Packer management would lose a lot of support if they traded the face of their organization. Brett will play one more year, after this one, with the Packers and then retire. I hate to see him go, but no one can play forever.
2006-12-15 04:38:14 · answer #4 · answered by Mike 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
One might say that Packer fans would be upset by such a move...but I beg to differ. If the Packers could get good quality for rebuilding in such a trade, they would be better off to make it...especially if Sir Brett wants to play for another Super Bowl contender next year.
Would the fans be upset...absolutely. However, I'd be more upset if they sat on their hands and didn't improve the club for the future while they can.
2006-12-15 05:11:52 · answer #5 · answered by Gwydyon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It would help the Packers down the road if they could get a Herschel Walker-type deal.....but Ted T. would be hanging from a rope, with a torched house to boot. Plus, who would QB? Rodgers is out for the year...and the other 2 backups don't know the whole system yet. Teddy & MM need to win NOW.....
2006-12-15 04:38:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being a diehard Viking fan, its hard for me to say this, BUT Farve is not exactly having a bad year this year so why would they trade him?
2006-12-15 04:58:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i highly doubt it would ever happen even if he wants to play longer he wil probly only do it in greenbay, and the only reason i dont want him to get traded and play for anyone else is becuase i know that dumbass daniel snieder will sign him to the skins, and thats all we need, another washed up QB tryin to hold onto his glory, nothin against farve but hes not the same anymore
2006-12-15 05:05:01 · answer #8 · answered by kydd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm a Packer fan, yet I nevertheless question why they did no longer commerce him faster. it would have saved a super type of this mess. Favre in simple terms needs to play. the actuality he did no longer take the money confirmed plenty. yet, it is not in simple terms the Packers to blame. i'm happy it incredibly is over so Packer followers can flow on. They stated Aaron Rodgers replaced into their pass to guy. that's nice and super, yet they ought to have traded Favre faster. i do no longer comprehend what they have been thinking. i might have enjoyed seeing him play for the Packers, yet am happy to a definite volume he's no longer. i might have enjoyed to ascertain him win a superbowl, yet then we'd have questioned no count if he replaced into staying or going right here 12 months. Jets are incredibly taking it season by using season so if Favre gets wishy washy then Jets can get a quarterback to be backup until he leaves. i might incredibly comprehend we've a quarterback for awhile. to boot i opt for to comprehend what Rodgers can do. *LOL* i'm continuously going to have my Favre jersey nevertheless. If Rodgers gets harm they have Brian Brohm. back, i might opt for to ascertain what he can do to boot. It wasn't the Packers fault on my own for this drama and Packers weren't completely unjustified in no longer desiring him. Favre threw them for a loop. they had moved on and as they flow at right here comes Favre. All i will say is thank goodness it incredibly is over. Now enable's come back to soccer instead of drama.
2016-10-05 08:45:15 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what they will be saying about Brett Favre in Greenbay 50 years from today?....... Answer: He still plays pretty good for an old guy! They won't trade him....
2006-12-15 04:50:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brett will retire before he ever wears a different uniform in the NFL.
2006-12-15 04:38:14 · answer #11 · answered by mck642 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋