My uncle is convicted of a rape charge that happen in 2000 he was getting out of jail and they took his DNA 2weeks before getting out and told him that he was charged with a rape that hapen in 2000
2006-12-15 02:58:58 · 6 answers · asked by kidzcountry@sbcglobal.net 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
There shouldnt be one for newborn rape, and if there became it wouldnt be up by using now. the actually concern is that he would have actually been 8 on the first one and he couldnt get in hassle for that for the reason that he didnt understand what he became doing. he remains extremely youthful yet he absolutely desires some type of remedy for the reason that he hasnt stopped. i'd call newborn protection amenities or the police to work out what they could do about it because it is definitely a topic.
2016-10-18 08:05:00 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe statu te of limitations vary depending upon the violation and the state laws. But, the law is very much within its limits to DNA test and hold him, if that DNA matches. The year 2000 isn't very far in the past and if he is guilty of the rape, he needs to be held responsible. If his DNA matched, there is no getting out of it. DNA does not lie.
2006-12-15 03:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by Suzan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The crime of rape that happen in 2000, has not yet prescribed in 2006 because it is a grave offense under the Penal Law.
2006-12-15 03:03:17 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
20 years
2006-12-15 03:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, I thought this question might be about Bill again!
2006-12-15 03:08:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋