I wished I had better health care avaiable to me than just Tri-care. I know you would say :"Consider your self lucky." However, when you have a heart condition like mine, and you need specalists to treat you just for that expertise, than what choice do you have, when you can't determine proper health care? Why can't the richest country that the USA is implement such providing health care to all of it's citizen, whether they are poor or rich? What must it take to do it?
2006-12-15 02:43:21 · 7 answers · asked by angelikabertrand64 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I do not understand why some people like Nolan are so darn rude. I love being first generation German-American. So shame on you for not being tolerant towards others. Hope you get paid back one day your ignorant behavor.
2006-12-15 05:18:34 · update #1
Germany is a democratic system when also offering soalized medicine. It has been implemented in 1898 when Otto v. Bismarck was the reigning chancellor. So look up for both of these name.
2006-12-15 05:21:44 · update #2
Because conservatives don't care about the lower classes. But they do need cheap cannon-fodder for an unpopular war.
You will see an attempt at a nationalized health care system if the democrats run the house, senate and the executive branch. Just wait till the backlash against "conservatives" in 08. :)
2006-12-15 02:50:47 · answer #1 · answered by arcaemous 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The health insurance companies are very powerful and making money. Our system of health care is changes in many ways. So I think that the health care systems don't want to change what they already have in place.
There are programs, for the poor and low income. Check out your state's website for that information. Insurance in available like that in my state of New Jersey, it is affordable health insurance.
2006-12-15 02:50:38 · answer #2 · answered by No More Abuse 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The German health care system is going bankrupt. America has the best doctors in the world. The financing of our "system" is pretty screwy but in terms of care rendered it is the best. England recently met a goal that had been believed to be unattainable: beginning cancer treatment within two months of diagnosis. In the US treatment begins within two hours of the diagnosis.
2006-12-15 02:52:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Germany is a socialist country. Perhaps if Germany when deomcratic it would be a great coutry in the world rather than jusst another socialist country in the world. Why would you want to implement socialist things that will raise your taxes even more than they are now?
2006-12-15 02:51:19 · answer #4 · answered by KIB 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Tri-care is the military equivalent to socialized medicine. Still cheaper for you!
If you don't like choice.
Renounce your citizenship and move to Germany.
2006-12-15 02:49:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
the reason were the richest country in the world is because were not like GERMANY we Capitalism and free market
2006-12-15 02:53:25 · answer #6 · answered by steven b 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We could. In fact, I'm sure America could have a great nationalized healthcare system.
However, we choose not to.
Some nations choose to have nationalized healthcare because they feel a sense of responsibility and compassion toward their fellow citizens. Some nations don't feel that, so they choose not to.
2006-12-15 02:52:17 · answer #7 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋