2006-12-15 01:58:33 · 13 answers · asked by happy67 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
there is people that say it wasnt an accident i was just curious to find out people"s opinions
2006-12-15 02:04:06 · update #1
I think it was neither deliberate nor an accident. I say this because I think that there are no "true accidents." Things don't just happen, they happen because someone is not paying attention, someone is driving recklessly because they are under the influence of alcohol, or someone is not in any condition to drive for other reasons (such they are too old and their eyesight is going). In this case, the "accident" happened because the paparazzi was too aggressive, and couldn't just let their "story" and picture-taking opportunity go.
2006-12-15 02:18:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lady Di really irritated and irked the royal family. She failed to live up to her responsibility of being the future Queen of England, and mother of the future King of England. If she didn't want the responsibility, she shouldn't have married Prince Charles. Yes, she was young and naive when she married. Nevertheless, it was her marriage that made her famous and a household name. Who would have heard of Lady Spencer? It was her marriage into the royal family that made her famous, and she tried to cut ties with her celebrity. And that might have caused her death. Who knows if it was done on purpose? The French chauffeur in the crashed car was drunk as a skunk. She had just left the a hotel for the rich and famous. The French have historical relationships with England going back 1,000 years. Yet, like the JFK killing in this country 44 years ago, it's not the right for common folks like us to know what happened to JFK or Lady Di.
2006-12-15 02:09:57 · answer #2 · answered by mac 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This has always intrigued me and I am glad you asked the question. I think it was not an accident. Princess Diana was very popular and I think the British royalty shunned her from the beginning of her marriage to Prince Charles. I think the marriage was a set-up, but Diana did not know it. When she divorced him and her popularity only climbed, the royal family probably did not look fondly on this turn of events. Who knows, maybe she knew more than they wanted the public to know. Get her driver drunk. Presto. What a tragedy. She was a beautiful person inside and out. I always admired her.
2006-12-15 02:19:51 · answer #3 · answered by Lost in Maryland 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think it was an unfortunate accident that happened almost a decade ago, and I think people should let it rest in piece already. It has been proved once again, that it was the drunk drivers doing, there is no cover up or conspiracy going on, let all who were involved rest in peace.
2006-12-15 02:17:17 · answer #4 · answered by Michelle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People who still talking about the death of Princess Diana should get a life. the woman has been dead for 10 years, get over it.
2006-12-15 04:24:23 · answer #5 · answered by vv 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was an accident. Believe it or not they happen. Why can't people just leave it in the past where it belongs?
2006-12-15 02:06:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
homicide. Fayed's father believes a similar element. only imagine: the mummy of the destiny King of england married to a Muslim. Uh uh. No way. clinical remedy replaced into deliberately withheld lengthy adequate to allow Diana to die, even with the actual shown truth that she ought to were helpd alongside to her demise even quicker. Royals have commited politically expedient murders for hundreds of years for the sake of the monarchy. Jack the Ripper replaced into Sir William Gull, clinical specialist to Queen Victoria, and a Freemason. The murders were all performed in accordance to Masonic regulation and in accordance to the tale, cost Albert Victor, grandson of Victoria, frolicked with Bohemians in tawdry setcions of London and wound up with a prostitute whom he married and had a toddler with techniques from. 5 different prossies were witnesses to the union and all were murdered interior the JTR case. The Royal spouse replaced into taken to an asylum and given a lobotomy. the youngster replaced into imprisoned interior the asylum and died in her young children. Prince Albert died from an STD which affected his mind. All replaced into performed to maintain the monarchy...and all files at Scotland backyard destroyed.
2016-11-30 19:39:27 · answer #7 · answered by rothberg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a senseless accident - if the paparzzi would have left her alone and let her live her life - well....
2006-12-15 02:22:30 · answer #8 · answered by what's up? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The same people that were behind JFK and 9-11 are behind this as well. Is that what you wanted to hear.
2006-12-15 02:07:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ofcourse it was an accident.
2006-12-15 02:01:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋