thats an intrusting question i think, would you rather fight with swords and shields, or guns, and tell me why.
2006-12-15 01:56:33 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
just drop one bomb, and have it over
2006-12-15 01:58:24 · answer #1 · answered by timestamps 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably medieval times because you don't have to worry about getting hit with a bullet. Plus, they were armored so it would take a precise hit or a long time to be killed by a sword...unless they were just ambushed. The only thing on your body that was somewhat protected in WWII was your head with a Kevlar helmet. The rest was open game.
2006-12-15 02:01:21 · answer #2 · answered by DJ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely WW 2...even so we did lose a lot of men...it was done in a civilise way.
You don't have to go back to medieval times. Just watch the movie Waterloo...absolute butchery.
But I tell you what...you would be hard press today to find a few men as brave as those of those great wars.
Those men went to war in the full knowledge that there was a 60% chance of them not coming back. That's take guts...
None of the bullshit of today where people expect to fight a war without killing anyone.
2006-12-15 02:10:35 · answer #3 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would rather fight in medievil times because there is honor chivilry in battle. Also every great warriors sword (or other weapon of choice) was customized and personlalized for the bearer. Nothing is really all that personal in modern warfare because everything is mass produced with hardly any customization or personalization. Not that I like warfare....I just would choose medievil if I had to fight.
2006-12-15 02:03:15 · answer #4 · answered by Warrior Poet 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
depend, medeval batter can take very long some time even decade, while wwII is long too, but look how many man had been loss compare to medeval, i rather fight in medieval over worldwar II cause is much more honor that way, aleast u had a fair chance to fight, unlike wwii all depend who has better tech and more troop.
2006-12-17 15:15:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Medieval times I can out run a blade not a bullet ! LOL
2006-12-15 02:00:03 · answer #6 · answered by Frendly 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it doesnt matter which kind of battle to fight in.
people die. whether they are righteous or sinners.
swords and shields is slow and painful if you still breath
guns can kill in minutes too, but survivors end up with missing limbs and shell shock.
if God sent me to medevil times or 20 th century. i would live and fight and die in either circumstance.
to fight with swords one must have a strenght. with gunz a person must be lucky to avoid bullets
2006-12-15 02:01:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋