When is "w" going to overturn Roe vs Wade?The pro-lifers claimed victory for "w" are you going to take responsibilty for Deaths relating to war?
2006-12-15 01:15:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
W is currently busy with the Iraq War. He has no time to consider the abortion issue !!!
2006-12-15 01:19:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Okay, ready guys....I'm going to teach you third-grade information.
There are three branches of government - the Executive, the Legislative and the Judicial. The Legislative has the power to make the laws. The Executive has the power to enforce the laws. The Judicial has the power to interpret the laws.
The Judicial decided Roe V. Wade saying that abortion was a right under the Constitution. The only way to change that is for the Constitution to change, which is started by the Legislative Branch. Or the Judicial can hear another case and change it's mind. See where the Executive has the power to overturn Roe v. Wade...Oh wait, it doesn't.
And what abortion has to do with the war doesn't make sense to me...but why should it? At least I paid attention in third grade government.
2006-12-15 09:30:55 · answer #2 · answered by jerry 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry about your lack of understanding of how government works but Roe V Wade was a COURT DECISION. How can a President overturn a court decision?
Roe V. Wade, deaths relating to war? What's the correlation?
You're just not making sense.
2006-12-15 09:19:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 10⤊ 1⤋
The abortion question is also getting verrry old. I don't know how many times I've written about this topic. But abortions no longer necessary. We have wonderful new forms of birth control. We have the morning after pill now that can be given in the ER after a women's had unprotected sex or has been raped.
People need to become educated on their options. And know how to utilize them.
I also feel ignorance of their options is a dumb excuse, since you can access the Internet at your local library. You can talk to nurses for free.
And people can stop seeing it as Okay to just go out and spread their legs for every... Tom... Dick... and ... of ... course... Harry.
Edit: Jerry - Thanks for the refresher course on how our government is set up.
2006-12-15 09:31:51 · answer #4 · answered by Mikira 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
George and Laura used fertillity treatments to get pregnant woth the twins. Given that these treatments require several fertilized eggs, and several implantations, I would like to know how many implanted versus how many were born, and how many were not implanted and were destroyed. Then, I would like to point out that if roe v wade were overturned the reps wouldn't have that as a platform anymore. It is an issue for being elected, not one they actually plan on taking on. And if they did, a civil war would ensue
2006-12-15 09:39:45 · answer #5 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Dubya can't overturn R vs. W, only the supreme court. He is working hard to make it right wing, lets hope the moderate judges stay in court for another 2 years or you can kiss ur civil liberties good bye, they will just re write the constitution.
2006-12-15 09:36:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Abortion is not barbaric it is a personal choice and unless you are capable of giving birth to a child, it should not be decided by you. One thing women can do that men can't and they still want to control it.
2006-12-15 09:18:32 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Maybe you should take responsibility for the murders that you commit and quit blaming bush for not being able to keep your legs crossed.
2006-12-15 09:22:04 · answer #8 · answered by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Stephanie, I'm sorry they said that about Slavery too.
Abortion is so barbaric. What an atrocity.
2006-12-15 09:24:38 · answer #9 · answered by delgados12 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The Devil will always have victories and no one can stop all of the murders going on worldwide.
2006-12-15 09:20:08 · answer #10 · answered by Jade 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋